Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGare, R
dc.contributor.authorGogalniceanu, P
dc.contributor.authorMaple, H
dc.contributor.authorBurnapp, L
dc.contributor.authorClarke, A
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, L
dc.contributor.authorNorton, S
dc.contributor.authorChilcot, J
dc.contributor.authorGibbs, P
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, A
dc.contributor.authorMcCrone, P
dc.contributor.authorDraper, H
dc.contributor.authorMamode, N
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-19T15:39:34Z
dc.date.available2020-10-19T15:39:34Z
dc.date.issued2017-09
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.otherARTN e015971
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/16568
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Introduction</jats:title><jats:p>Living donation accounts for over one-third of all kidney transplants taking place in the UK.<jats:sup>1</jats:sup>The concept of anonymously donating a kidney to a stranger (non-directed altruistic or unspecified kidney donation (UKD)) remains uncomfortable for some clinicians, principally due to concerns about the motivations and long-term physical and psychological outcomes in this donor group.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims</jats:title><jats:p>The research programme aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the unspecified donor programme in the UK. It aims to identify reasons for variations in practice across centres, explore outcomes for donors and ascertain barriers and facilitators to UKD, as well as assess the economic implications of unspecified donation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>The research programme will adopt a mixed-methods approach to assessing UKD nationally using focus groups, interviews and questionnaires. Two study populations will be investigated. The first will include transplant professionals involved in unspecified kidney donation. The second will include a 5-year prospective cohort of individuals who present to any of the 23 UK transplant centres as a potential unspecified living kidney donor. Physical and psychological outcomes will be followed up to 1 year following donation or withdrawal from the donation process. A matched sample of specified donors (those donating to someone they know) will be recruited as a control group. Further qualitative work consisting of interviews will be performed on a purposive sample of unspecified donors from both groups (those who do and do not donate).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Dissemination</jats:title><jats:p>The findings will be reported to NHS Blood and Transplant and the British Transplant Society with a view to developing national guidelines and a protocol for the management of those presenting for unspecified donation.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration number</jats:title><jats:p>ISRCTN23895878, Pre-results.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extente015971-e015971
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMJ
dc.subjectaltruistic/unspecified donation
dc.subjectchronic renal failure
dc.subjectkidney
dc.subjectrenal transplantation
dc.subjectAltruism
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnel
dc.subjectFocus Groups
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectKidney Transplantation
dc.subjectLiving Donors
dc.subjectMotivation
dc.subjectProspective Studies
dc.subjectQualitative Research
dc.subjectQuality of Life
dc.subjectResearch Design
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectTissue and Organ Harvesting
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom
dc.titleUnderstanding barriers and outcomes of unspecified (non-directed altruistic) kidney donation from both professional’s and patient’s perspectives: research protocol for a national multicentre mixed-methods prospective cohort study
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeMulticenter Study
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000412650700089&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue9
plymouth.volume7
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBMJ Open
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015971
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015971
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV