Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSwancutt, Dawn
dc.contributor.authorHope, SV
dc.contributor.authorKent, BP
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, M
dc.contributor.authorGoodwin, VA
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-12T17:25:12Z
dc.date.available2020-10-12T17:25:12Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-06
dc.identifier.issn1471-2318
dc.identifier.issn1471-2318
dc.identifier.other385
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/16525
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>Falls are the most common reason for ambulance callouts resulting in non-conveyance. Even in the absence of injury, only half of those who fall can get themselves up off the floor, often remaining there over an hour, increasing risk of complications.</jats:p> <jats:p>There are recognized techniques for older people to learn how to get up after a fall, but these are rarely taught. The aim of this study was to develop an understanding of attitudes of older people, carers and health professionals on getting up following a fall.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>A qualitative focus group and semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 participants, including community-dwelling older people with experience of a non-injurious fall, carers, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, paramedics and first responders. Data were transcribed and analysed systematically using the Framework approach. A stakeholder group of falls experts and service users advised during analysis.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>The data highlighted three areas contributing to an individual’s capability to get-up following a fall: the environment (physical and social); physical ability; and degree of self-efficacy (attitude and beliefs about their own ability). These factors fell within the wider context of making a decision about needing help, which included what training and knowledge each person already had to manage their fall response.</jats:p> <jats:p>Staff described how they balance their responsibilities, prioritising the individual’s immediate needs; this leaves limited time to address capability in the aforementioned three areas. Paramedics, routinely responding to falls, only receive training on getting-up techniques from within their peer-group. Therapists are aware of the skillset to breakdown the getting-up process, but, with limited time, select who to teach these techniques to.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>Neither therapists nor ambulance service staff routinely teach strategies on how to get up, meaning that healthcare professionals largely have a reactive role in managing falls. Interventions that address the environment, physical ability and self-efficacy could positively impact on peoples’ capability to get up following a fall. Therefore, a more proactive approach would be to teach people techniques to manage these aspects of future falls and to provide them easily accessible information.</jats:p> </jats:sec>

dc.format.extent385-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectCapability
dc.subjectFalls
dc.subjectGetting up
dc.subjectOlder people
dc.subjectQualitative
dc.subjectRehabilitation
dc.subjectAccidental Falls
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectAged, 80 and over
dc.subjectAmbulances
dc.subjectAttitude
dc.subjectFocus Groups
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIndependent Living
dc.titleKnowledge, skills and attitudes of older people and staff about getting up from the floor following a fall: a qualitative investigation
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33023509
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume20
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBMC Geriatrics
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12877-020-01790-7
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-09-24
dc.rights.embargodate2020-10-14
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2318
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s12877-020-01790-7
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-10-06
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV