Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaptie, G
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, J
dc.contributor.authorBacon, AM
dc.contributor.authorNorman, Alyson
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-12T14:46:01Z
dc.date.available2020-10-12T14:46:01Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-02
dc.identifier.issn0969-4900
dc.identifier.issn2052-4307
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/16522
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p> Many women experience their childbirth as traumatic, and 4-6% of mothers present with postnatal post-traumatic stress disorder. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aims</jats:title><jats:p> To measure the relationship between obstetric intervention, perceived support in childbirth and mothers' experiences of postnatal trauma, and to identify salient aspects of the birth experience that are considered traumatic. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> A total of 222 women in their first year postpartum were recruited between October and December 2018 via local mother and baby groups in southwest England (UK) and online social media pages. They completed an online survey regarding their birth experience. Further insight into mother's birth experiences was garnered through free-text responses in the survey. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> Overall, 29% of mothers experienced a traumatic birth and 15% met full or partial criteria for post-traumatic stress disorder. Feeling supported mediated the relationship between obstetric intervention and postnatal trauma symptoms. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p> This study reinforces the value of supportive healthcare professionals and the power of a nurturing environment, which can buffer the potentially negative effects of an obstetrically complicated birth on postnatal trauma symptoms. </jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent724-730
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMark Allen Group
dc.titleBirth trauma: the mediating effects of perceived support
dc.typejournal-article
plymouth.issue10
plymouth.volume28
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBritish Journal of Midwifery
dc.identifier.doi10.12968/bjom.2020.28.10.724
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)/Behaviour
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-09-15
dc.rights.embargodate2021-7-6
dc.identifier.eissn2052-4307
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.12968/bjom.2020.28.10.724
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-10-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV