Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWang, H-T
dc.contributor.authorHo, Nerissa
dc.contributor.authorBzdok, D
dc.contributor.authorBernhardt, BC
dc.contributor.authorMargulies, DS
dc.contributor.authorJefferies, E
dc.contributor.authorSmallwood, J
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-16T12:04:35Z
dc.date.available2020-09-16T12:04:35Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-17
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.other11904
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/16366
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Features of ongoing experience are common across individuals and cultures. However, certain people express specific patterns of thought to a greater extent than others. Contemporary psychological theory assumes that individual differences in thought patterns occur because different types of experience depend on the expression of different neurocognitive processes. Consequently, individual variation in the underlying neurocognitive architecture is hypothesised to determine the ease with which certain thought patterns are generated or maintained. Our study (N = 178) tested this hypothesis using multivariate pattern analysis to infer shared variance among measures of cognitive function and neural organisation and examined whether these latent variables explained reports of the patterns of on-going thoughts people experienced in the lab. We found that relatively better performance on tasks relying primarily on semantic knowledge, rather than executive control, was linked to a neural functional organisation associated, via meta-analysis, with task labels related to semantic associations (sentence processing, reading and verbal semantics). Variability of this functional mode predicted significant individual variation in the types of thoughts that individuals experienced in the laboratory: neurocognitive patterns linked to better performance at tasks that required guidance from semantic representation, rather than those dependent on executive control, were associated with patterns of thought characterised by greater subjective detail and a focus on time periods other than the here and now. These relationships were consistent across different days and did not vary with level of task demands, indicating they are relatively stable features of an individual’s cognitive profile. Together these data confirm that individual variation in aspects of ongoing experience can be inferred from hidden neurocognitive architecture and demonstrate that performance trade-offs between executive control and long-term semantic knowledge are linked to a person’s tendency to imagine situations that transcend the here and now.</jats:p>

dc.format.extent11904-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectBrain Cortical Thickness
dc.subjectCognition
dc.subjectExecutive Function
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectSemantics
dc.subjectTask Performance and Analysis
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.titleNeurocognitive patterns dissociating semantic processing from executive control are linked to more detailed off-task mental time travel
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000550002600008&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume10
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalScientific Reports
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/s41598-020-67605-2
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience MANUAL
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-06-08
dc.rights.embargodate2020-10-23
dc.identifier.eissn2045-2322
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1038/s41598-020-67605-2
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-07-17
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV