Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Gen
dc.contributor.authorHall, JAen
dc.contributor.authorHowden, Ben
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Den
dc.contributor.authorShawe, Jen
dc.contributor.authorStephenson, Jen
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-15T13:41:47Z
dc.date.available2020-09-15T13:41:47Z
dc.date.issued2020-07-10en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/16352
dc.descriptionNo embargo required.en
dc.description.abstract

<jats:p>BackgroundThe role of women’s partners in pregnancy planning has gained importance with the development of preconception care. The measurement of pregnancy planning/intention has also changed in the last two decades with the development of psychometric measures such as the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy (LMUP). This analysis aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of a version of the LMUP for women’s partners in the UK.&#x0D; MethodsThe LMUP items, adapted for completion by partners, were piloted and included in a survey of (mainly male) partners in three antenatal clinics in London, UK, as part of a study of pre-pregnancy health and care. The psychometric properties of the partner LMUP were assessed according to the principles of Classical Test Theory.&#x0D; ResultsThere were 575 partners of pregnant women in the sample, 573 (99.7%) being men. There were high comple-tion rates for all the LMUP items. The distribution of LMUP scores ranged from 1–12, with a negative skew (biased towards planned/intended pregnancies). In terms of reliability (internal consistency), Cronbach’s alpha was 0.69, item-rest correlations were &gt;0.2 for five items, and all inter-item correlations were positive. In terms of construct validity, principal components analysis showed that measurement was unidimensional, confirmatory factor analysis showed good model fit, and the convergent validity hypothesis of non-perfect, moderate-to-good agreement between couples’ LMUP scores was met.&#x0D; ConclusionsThe partner LMUP performed well in terms of reliability and validity according to internationally-accepted criteria for the performance of psychometric measures and can be used in future research on men and couples. However, we recommend further research relating to the concept of pregnancy planning/inten-tion among partners of all gender identities to understand whether additional content would enhance the measurement of the construct. In particular, we recommend further conceptual exploration with men who have experienced unplanned pregnancies.&#x0D;  </jats:p>

en
dc.format.extente65 - e77en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherDougmar Publishing Group, Inc.en
dc.titleEvaluation of the Psychometric Properties of a Version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy for Women’s Partnersen
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue1en
plymouth.volume3en
plymouth.journalInternational Journal of Mens Social and Community Healthen
dc.identifier.doi10.22374/ijmsch.v3i1.20en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-06-15en
dc.rights.embargodate2020-09-24en
dc.identifier.eissn2561-9179en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.22374/ijmsch.v3i1.20en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-07-10en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV