Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJoshi, Mahesh Raj
dc.contributor.authorSimmers, AJ
dc.contributor.authorJeon, ST
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-15T08:41:41Z
dc.date.available2020-09-15T08:41:41Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-21
dc.identifier.issn1552-5783
dc.identifier.issn1552-5783
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/16296
dc.description.abstract

PURPOSE: Directly comparing the motion and form processing in neurologic disorders has remained difficult due to the limitations in the experimental stimulus. In the current study, motion and form processing in amblyopia was characterized using random dot stimuli in different noise levels to parse out the effect of local and global processing on motion and form perception. METHODS: A total of 17 amblyopes (8 anisometropic and 9 strabismic), and 12 visually normal subjects monocularly estimated the global direction of motion and global orientation in random dot kinematograms (RDK) and Glass patterns (Glass), whose directions/orientations were drawn from normal distributions with a range of means and variances that served as external noise. Direction/orientation discrimination thresholds were measured without noise first then variance threshold was measured at the multiples of the direction/orientation threshold. The direction/orientation and variance thresholds were modelled to estimate internal noise and sampling efficiency parameters. RESULTS: Overall, the thresholds for Glass were higher than RDK for all subjects. The thresholds for both Glass and RDK were higher in the strabismic eyes compared with the fellow and normal eyes. On the other hand, the thresholds for anisometropic amblyopic eyes were similar to the normal eyes. The worse performance of strabismic amblyopes was best explained by relatively low sampling efficiency compared with other groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A deficit in global motion and form perception was only evident in strabismic amblyopia. Contrary to the dorsal stream deficiency hypothesis assumed in other developmental disorders, deficits were present in both motion (dorsal) and form (ventral) processing.

dc.format.extent5015-5015
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO)
dc.subjectamblyopia
dc.subjectmotion perception
dc.subjectform perception
dc.subjectdorsal stream dysfunction
dc.subjectnoise
dc.titleConcurrent Investigation of Global Motion and Form Processing in Amblyopia: An Equivalent Noise Approach
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000390156400061&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue11
plymouth.volume57
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalInvestigative Opthalmology &amp; Visual Science
dc.identifier.doi10.1167/iovs.15-18609
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Health Professions
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dc.identifier.eissn1552-5783
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1167/iovs.15-18609
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV