Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClose, James
dc.contributor.authorFosh, B
dc.contributor.authorByng, Richard
dc.contributor.authorBlackwell, R
dc.contributor.authorWitts, L
dc.contributor.authorHall, L
dc.contributor.authorLloyd, Helen
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-09T08:45:32Z
dc.date.available2020-07-09T08:45:32Z
dc.date.issued2019-06
dc.identifier.issn0960-1643
dc.identifier.issn1478-5242
dc.identifier.otherARTN bjgp19X702905
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15891
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>The Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF) for general practice is one of the largest pay-for-performance schemes in the world. The scheme, however, is sometimes viewed as anachronistic, with recent proposals for a slimmed down QOF. Over the last few years, Somerset have been trialling a system with national implications: 55 GP practices in Somerset established the Somerset Quality Practice Scheme (SPQS) — a de-incentivisation of QOF — with the goal of redirecting resources towards improved Person Centred Coordinated Care (P3C), especially for those with long-term conditions.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim</jats:title><jats:p>An evaluation of the SPQS scheme to establish benefits (for example in provision of P3C) or disbenefits (for example in emergency admissions).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method</jats:title><jats:p>A longitudinal evaluation from 55 SPQS practices and 17 regional controls. Patient experiences (2363 patients), staff experiences (127 professionals), and organisational data (for SPQS and control practices) were collected. Emergency admission data was analysed for ambulatory-sensitive conditions across Somerset.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Discretion from QOF resulted in time savings in the majority of practices. Organisational data revealed a significant increase in P3C. Care delivery was improved via stronger federation-level agreements and informal networks, increased multidisciplinary working, reallocation of resources for other healthcare professionals and changes to the structure and timings of GP appointments. Patient and practitioner experiences were similar in SPQS versus control practices. No disbenefits were detected in admissions data.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>The SPQS scheme leveraged time savings and reduced administrative burden via discretionary removal of QOF, enabling participating practices to engage in a number of schemes aimed at improving care for people with LTCs.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extentbjgp19X702905-bjgp19X702905
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRoyal College of General Practitioners
dc.subjectHealth Services
dc.subjectClinical Research
dc.subject8.1 Organisation and delivery of services
dc.subjectGeneric health relevance
dc.titleEvaluation of a countywide alternative to QOF, aimed at improving person-centred coordinated care
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJOUR
plymouth.author-urlhttp://bjgp.org/lookup/doi/10.3399/bjgp19X702905
plymouth.issuesuppl 1
plymouth.volume69
plymouth.publisher-urlhttps://bjgp.org/content/69/suppl_1.cover.pdf
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBritish Journal of General Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.3399/bjgp19X702905
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-05-30
dc.rights.embargodate2020-7-15
dc.identifier.eissn1478-5242
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.3399/bjgp19X702905
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-06
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV