Concealment of Birth: Time to Repeal a 200-Year-Old “Convenient Stop-Gap”?
dc.contributor.author | Milne, Emma | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-05-11T12:21:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-07 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0966-3622 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1572-8455 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15651 | |
dc.description.abstract |
Feminists have long argued that women who offend are judged by who they are, not what they do, with idealised images of femininity and motherhood used as measures of culpability. The ability to meet the expectations of motherhood and femininity are particularly difficult for women who experience a crisis pregnancy, as evident in cases where women have been convicted of concealment of birth. The offence prohibits the secret disposal of the dead body of a child, to conceal knowledge of its birth. Traditionally used to prosecute women suspected of killing their newborn children, analysis of court transcripts suggests the offence is also used to punish women who fail to meet expectations of motherhood. This paper analyses three contemporary cases in light of the historical origins of the offence, illustrating the legacy of prejudice against ‘deviant’ mothers. Finally, it questions the continued existence of this archaic offence. | |
dc.format.extent | 139-162 | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | Concealment of birth | |
dc.subject | Feminism | |
dc.subject | Gender justice | |
dc.subject | Motherhood | |
dc.subject | Newborn child death | |
dc.subject | Women offenders | |
dc.title | Concealment of Birth: Time to Repeal a 200-Year-Old “Convenient Stop-Gap”? | |
dc.type | journal-article | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
plymouth.author-url | https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000480475300002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008 | |
plymouth.issue | 2 | |
plymouth.volume | 27 | |
plymouth.publisher-url | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10691-019-09401-6 | |
plymouth.publication-status | Published | |
plymouth.journal | Feminist Legal Studies | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10691-019-09401-6 | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA18 Law | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-03-25 | |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2020-5-27 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1572-8455 | |
dc.rights.embargoperiod | Not known | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1007/s10691-019-09401-6 | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-07 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review |