Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHills, Peter
dc.contributor.authorMileva, Mila
dc.contributor.authorThompson, C
dc.contributor.authorPake, JM
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-03T09:54:48Z
dc.date.available2020-04-03T09:54:48Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-25
dc.identifier.issn1350-6285
dc.identifier.issn1464-0716
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15494
dc.description.abstract

Face perception is characterized by a distinct scanpath. While eye movements are considered functional, there has not been direct evidence that disrupting this scanpath affects face recognition performance. The present experiment investigated the influence of an irrelevant letter-search task (with letter strings arranged horizontally, vertically, or randomly) on the subsequent scanning strategies in processing upright and inverted famous faces. Participants’ response time to identify the face and the direction of their eye movements were recorded. The orientation of the letter search influenced saccadic direction when viewing the face images, such that a direct carryover-effect was observed. Following a vertically oriented letter-search task, the recognition of famous faces was slower and less accurate for upright faces, and faster for inverted faces. These results extend the carryover findings of Thompson and Crundall into a novel domain. Crucially they also indicate that upright and inverted faces are better processed by different eye movements, highlighting the importance of scanpaths in face recognition.

dc.format.extent459-472
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInforma UK Limited
dc.subjectEye movements
dc.subjectcarryover
dc.subjectface perception
dc.subjectface inversion effect
dc.subjectscanpaths
dc.titleCarryover of scanning behaviour affects upright face recognition differently to inverted face recognition
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000404271800003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue9-10
plymouth.volume24
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalVisual Cognition
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13506285.2017.1314399
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience MANUAL
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.identifier.eissn1464-0716
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/13506285.2017.1314399
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV