Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKelly, Peter
dc.contributor.authorDorf, H
dc.contributor.authorPratt, Nicholas
dc.contributor.authorHohmann, Ulrike
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-19T15:28:34Z
dc.date.available2013-06-19T15:28:34Z
dc.date.issued2013-06-18
dc.identifier.issn1469-3623
dc.identifier.issn1469-3623
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/1545
dc.descriptionComparing teacher roles in Denmark and England
dc.description.abstract

This article reports the findings of a comparative study of teaching in Denmark and England; its broader aim is to help develop an approach for comparing pedagogy. Lesson observations and interviews identified the range of goals towards which teachers in each country worked and the actions these prompted. These were clustered using the lens of Bernstein’s pedagogic discourse (1990; 1996) to construct teacher roles which provided a view of pedagogy. Through this approach we have begun to identify variations in pedagogy across two countries. All teachers in this study adopted a variety of roles; of significance was the ease with which competent English teachers moved between roles. The English teachers observed adopted roles consistent with a wider techno-rationalist discourse. There was a greater subject emphasis by Danish teachers whose work was set predominantly within a democratic humanist discourse, whilst the English teachers placed a greater emphasis on applied skills.

dc.format.extent566-586
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)
dc.subjectcomparative pedagogy
dc.subjectDanish teaching
dc.subjectEnglish teaching
dc.subjectteacher roles
dc.titleComparing teacher roles in Denmark and England
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000337958700005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue4
plymouth.volume44
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalCompare
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03057925.2013.800786
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/Plymouth Institute of Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA23 Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-06-18
dc.identifier.eissn1469-3623
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/03057925.2013.800786
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2013-06-18
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV