Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShala, Besfort
dc.contributor.authorTrick, U
dc.contributor.authorLehmann, A
dc.contributor.authorGhita, B
dc.contributor.authorShiaeles, Stavros
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-10T12:17:41Z
dc.date.available2020-02-10T12:17:41Z
dc.date.issued2019-09
dc.identifier.issn2542-6605
dc.identifier.issn2542-6605
dc.identifier.other100058
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15367
dc.description.abstract

The increasing number of intelligent Machine-to-Machine Communication (M2M) devices in the end-user domain provide good resources for creating and sharing M2M application services. Therefore, transferring the role of a traditional centralized service provider to decentralized peers (end-users) acting as service providers is very promising. However, the future of decentralized M2M application services which are independently provided or consumed by several end-users in the M2M community depends on trust. Untrustworthy peers trying to deploy malfunctioning services for others mitigate the benefits of decentralized systems. Nowadays, the concept of distributed ledger and blockchain has an increased popularity regarding trustless computing among communities operating without centralized authorities. This research publication provides a comprehensive analysis and approach merging the concepts of M2M application services, trust and distributed ledger technologies. Moreover, this publication presents an optimized Trust Evaluation System which is used to ensure trustworthiness among peers in a M2M community. To improve the Trust Evaluation System the integration of blockchain for data storage is introduced. Additionally, blockchain technology is used to extend the existing trust model of the Trust Evaluation System to enable tamper-proof data and detection of untrustworthy peers. This publication reviews several existing approaches in the academic and industry sector to highlight the limitations of the blockchain regarding the consensus and proposes a novel Trust Consensus Protocol. This research publication also provides a practical evaluation of the proposed protocol.

dc.format.extent100058-100058
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subjectDistributed Ledger
dc.subjectBlockchain
dc.subjectConsensus Protocol
dc.subjectTrust
dc.subjectSecurity
dc.subjectM2M
dc.subjectService and Application
dc.titleNovel trust consensus protocol and blockchain-based trust evaluation system for M2M application services
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000695693700011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.volume7
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalInternet of Things
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.iot.2019.100058
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA11 Computer Science and Informatics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-05-10
dc.rights.embargodate2020-3-6
dc.identifier.eissn2542-6605
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.iot.2019.100058
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-09
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV