Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGreen, Jen
dc.contributor.authorEwings, Sen
dc.contributor.authorWortham, Ren
dc.contributor.authorWalsh, Ben
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-29T10:12:32Z
dc.date.available2019-11-29T10:12:32Z
dc.date.issued2019-01en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/15211
dc.description.abstract

<jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>The NHS Pathways (NHSP) medical call triage system is employed by UK ambulance services. One function is to identify a broad category of ‘high-acuity calls’, distinguishing them from those that do not require an emergency response. A new pre-triage screening tool, Nature of Call (NoC), designed to augment NHSP could be employed as a rapid initial sieve of broad acuity.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p>To identify the accuracy of NHSP (and NoC) in recognising patients who require an emergency ambulance response (and therefore those who may not).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Diagnostic accuracy. The sample is a retrospective cohort of consecutive calls, over a 4 month period, to a UK ambulance service. Sensitivity and specificity were determined, comparing allocated NoC and NHS Pathways priority dispositions with a composite reference standard comprised of administered medications, procedures, observations and clinical impressions associated with high-acuity, as recorded on ambulance electronic Patient Clinical Records.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>A total of 1 87 408 emergency calls were received. Of these, 71 373 were allocated both NoC and NHSP priority dispositions and were associated with electronic Patient Clinical Records. 40 997 (57%) of these patients met the high-acuity reference criteria. NHSP, sensitivity=98.1% (95% CI 98.0 to 98.2); specificity=5.9% (95% CI 5.6 to 6.1). NoC, sensitivity=84.0% (95% CI 83.7 to 84.4); specificity=26.5% (95% CI 26.0 to 27.0).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>NHSP is effective in identifying high-acuity patients (as is NoC). Sensitivity analysis therefore supports the this function of NHSP and NoC/NHSP to inform initial ambulance dispatch decisions, particularly if NoC categorisation is reviewed in the light of subsequent NHSP triage. However, both systems appear to achieve high sensitivity by also allocating most low-acuity calls to high-acuity categories. This significantly restricts operational application. Only one quarter of low-acuity calls are allocated the lowest priority category by NoC and one-in-seventeen by NHSP, severely restricting the group likely to be considered for alternative care pathways.</jats:p></jats:sec>

en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titlePP13 The NHS pathways (NHSP) medical call triage system and new ‘nature of call’ telephone screening tool, employed prior to NHSP, can accurately identify high acuity patients: analysis of sensitivity and specificity using routine ambulance service dataen
dc.typePresentation
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/emermed-2019-999.13en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/00 Groups by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/00 Groups by role/Academics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health: Medicine, Dentistry and Human Sciences/School of Health Professions
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/emermed-2019-999.13en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.typeOtheren


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV