Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStreet, J
dc.contributor.authorLaing, D
dc.contributor.authorSchroff, Simone
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-05T09:56:17Z
dc.date.available2019-07-05T09:56:17Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1477-2833
dc.identifier.issn1477-2833
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/14603
dc.description.abstract

This paper explores the role of intermediary institutions in promoting creativity and cultural diversity in the music industry, and the impact of cultural policy on the performance of those intermediaries. It reviews some of the existing literature on the relationship between economic conditions and innovation in music, and argues that too little attention has been paid to intermediaries. Focusing on collective management organisations (CMOs) as one example of overlooked intermediaries, we illustrate, by way of comparison, the different priorities and incentives that drive CMO practice. These variations, we suggest, are important to appreciating how CMOs operate as intermediaries in different territories. We then turn our attention to recent attempts by the EU to reform CMO practice as part of its Digital Single Market project. The fact that the CMO has been an object of reform is indicative of its importance. However, there is more at stake here: the reforms themselves, in seeking to change the role and behaviour of CMOs will, we suggest, have profound consequences for the market in music in Europe, and for creativity and cultural diversity within that market.

dc.format.extent368-386
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)
dc.subjectcollective management organisations
dc.subjectcreativity
dc.subjectcultural diversity
dc.subjectDigital Single Market
dc.subjectEU
dc.subjectmusic industry
dc.titleRegulating for Creativity and Cultural Diversity: the Case of Collective Management Organisations and the Music Industry
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJOUR
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume24
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalInternational Journal of Cultural Policy
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10286632.2016.1178733
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/School of Society and Culture
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA18 Law
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-04-12
dc.identifier.eissn1477-2833
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/10286632.2016.1178733
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV