Recommended, similar items
The following license files are associated with this item:
This paper seeks to identify and examine the extent to which there are substantive differences between the common law and equitable tests for non-contractual mistaken transfers. As the title suggests, the discussion references the case of Pitt v Holt as invoking the analogy of law and equity being ‘pitted’ against each other.
Graham, T. (2019). 'Pitted Against Each Other? Mistaken Transactions in Unjust Enrichment and Equity', The Plymouth Law & Criminal Justice Review, Vol. 11, p. 58-72.
The following license files are associated with this item: