Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAttwood, Den
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Ken
dc.contributor.authorJones, Len
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Len
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Fen
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-24T09:17:52Z
dc.date.available2019-05-24T09:17:52Z
dc.date.issued2018-09en
dc.identifier.issn2249-4863en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/14206
dc.description.abstract

Background: In the United Kingdom, the new NHS contract for primary care mandates that practices use the Electronic Frailty Index (EFI) to screen for frailty and apply clinical judgment, based on knowledge of the patient, to decide whether they have a diagnosis of frailty. EFI has not yet been validated for this purpose. Many primary care clinicians would agree that although not formally investigated, there seems to be a strong association between being housebound or in institutional care and having a diagnosis of frailty. Although being housebound or in institutional care is not commonly coded in primary care computer record systems (IT), this cohort of patients do require home visits if they become unwell. Home visits are coded and it is simple to run a search on primary care IT to generate a list of older people who have received a home over given period. Aim: This study assessed whether being housebound and requiring home visits could form a new screening tool for frailty. Design and Setting: Retrospective cohort study from 1/3/15 to 29/2/16. Primary care, South Devon. Method: Medical records of 154 patients over 65 years of age were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups: a group (n = 82) that had received a home visit and a second group consisting of a randomized sample of patients (n = 72) with similar baseline characteristics who had not. Patient records were analyzed by two clinicians to determine whether a frailty syndrome was present. Researchers were blinded to each other's results. An arbitrator determined the frailty status on disagreement. Results: Home visits have a sensitivity of 87.23% [95% confidence interval (CI): 74.35%-95.17%] and specificity of 61.68% (95% CI: 51.78%-70.92%). For frailty, Cohen's Kappa showed fair interobserver reliability. Conclusion: This study suggests that home visits are a good screen for frailty; the data are easy to retrieve from primary care IT and could be used as a valid screening tool to assist with identifying frailty in primary care.

en
dc.format.extent1007 - 1011en
dc.languageengen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.subjectDomiciliary visiten
dc.subjectfrailtyen
dc.subjecthome visiten
dc.subjecthouse callen
dc.subjectscreenen
dc.subjectscreening toolen
dc.titleHome visits: A new screening tool for frailty? A retrospective exploratory study.en
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30598948en
plymouth.issue5en
plymouth.volume7en
plymouth.publication-statusPublisheden
plymouth.journalJ Family Med Prim Careen
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_159_18en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeIndiaen
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_159_18en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV