Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUncles, C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-21T16:15:52Z
dc.date.available2019-05-21T16:15:52Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citation

Uncles, C. (2018) 'The development and evaluation of a first-year undergraduate physical chemistry experiment', The Plymouth Student Scientist, 11(1), p. 238-281.

en_US
dc.identifier.issn1754-2383
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/14180
dc.description.abstract

The laboratory in chemistry has been a place for student learning for many years. The study here developed a practical experiment to form part of the curriculum of Plymouth University’s BSc (Hons) Chemistry course for first year students. The experiment focused on physical chemistry and explored rates of reaction using a modified crystal violet and sodium hydroxide reaction. The modifications from an original method included the concentrations of sodium hydroxide and the instrument used. The practical was finalised and lab script produced in eight weeks. Further studies were also conducted surrounding the effect of temperature on the reaction. The resultant K’ values concluded that there is a linear relationship between K’ and temperature. The Meaning Learning in the Laboratory Instrument (MLLI) was used to measure students’ cognitive and affective learning in the laboratory. This consisted of two questionnaires to be completed on a voluntary basis by the students. The MLLI yielded results that indicated that meaningful learning was obtained in the laboratory for the devised experiment. A trend in the data was seen through use of box and whisker plots, positive relationship to meaningful learning saw an increase in students’ percentage agreement and a negative relationship saw a decrease in percentage agreement after the practical. Where questions were asked about data, the trend was still seen, but not as significantly as other questions. Influences upon the impact of meaningful learning were perceived to come from: the laboratory instructor, structure of laboratory and pre-lab, previous experiences, instrumentation, and group work. A focus group was held which further supported the findings of the questionnaire. It also provided insight into other aspects of the practical including the preparation leading up to the experiment where students watched a pre-lab video. Other aspects included the timing of the experiment in the curriculum timetable.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectphysical chemistry experimenten_US
dc.subjectevaluationen_US
dc.subjectfirst year undergraduateen_US
dc.subjectMeaning Learning in the Laboratory Instrumenten_US
dc.subjectBSc(Hons) Chemistryen_US
dc.subjectgroup worken_US
dc.subjectcognitive and affective learning in the laboratoryen_US
dc.titleThe development and evaluation of a first-year undergraduate physical chemistry experimenten_US
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume11
plymouth.journalThe Plymouth Student Scientist


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV