Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSebastian, E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-21T16:02:55Z
dc.date.available2019-05-21T16:02:55Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citation

Sebastian, E. (2018) 'An investigation on pipe surface topography beyond roughness', The Plymouth Student Scientist, 11(1), p. 170-198.

en_US
dc.identifier.issn1754-2383
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/14177
dc.description.abstract

There are always problems with pipes and associated blockages. These problems are commonly due to the obstacles sitting inside the pipe, such as sand particles and pebbles. This study considers whether there is any effect of topographies on pipe flow and how big the effect is, and to determine the characteristics of the topographies that affect the flow. The study was conducted by designing two types of topographies with similar shape but with different dimensions and spacing (wavelength) between asperities, Topography-1 and Topography-2. The study used a traditional experimental method. Topography was made by a casting process; firstly, by designing the topography and its mold using a Computer Aided Design (CAD) software and then creating the mold to cast the topography. Testing was conducted outdoors, inserting the rubber topographic component into a 110mm drainage pipe and then using a submersible pump to propel water through the pipe, with flow controlled using a valve in each set of the test. Testing was done by pumping water from a filled tank to an empty tank, using a plain pipe first; and then on two separate types of topography, enabling a subsequent analysis of the effects of the pipe on water flow with and without the topographic surface. The results were then processed to determine the flow rate, Reynolds number and Euler number as the water flows through the pipe. Statistical error calculations were performed to see how the results met the expectations of accuracy. Results from the experiment showed that there was an effect on the flow characteristics when water flowed through the topographic surface compared to the plain pipe. Topography-2 had a bigger effect on the pipe flow compared to Topography-1. Topopography-2 had a larger surface area compared to Topgraphy-1.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectpipe surface topographyen_US
dc.subjectblockagesen_US
dc.subjectReynolds numberen_US
dc.subjectEuler numberen_US
dc.subjectplain pipeen_US
dc.titleAn investigation on pipe surface topography beyond roughnessen_US
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume11
plymouth.journalThe Plymouth Student Scientist


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV