Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRudzinskis, E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-20T16:02:10Z
dc.date.available2019-05-20T16:02:10Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citation

Rudzinskis, E. (2017) '

en_US
dc.identifier.issn1754-2383
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/14163
dc.description.abstract

However, the findings have been variable suggesting a more refined experimental model to produce more robust results is needed. Therefore, the overall aim of this study was to improve the current understanding of BFRP rebar reinforced concrete beams’ flexural behaviour. Four class C28/35 concrete beams, reinforced with 8 mm diameter reinforcement elements, made of BFRP and traditional steel, were tested under flexure. The main actions carried out in the experiment were firstly, the recording of failure load and mid-span vertical displacements of the beams. Secondly, observation and investigation of failure modes by removing the concrete from the reinforcement of the tested beams. Thirdly, the investigation of how different reinforcement setups affected BFRP reinforced concrete beam flexural behaviour. Fourthly, the comparison of cracked and un-cracked section behaviour of BFRP and traditional steel rebar reinforced concrete beams. The fifth action was an assessment of whether traditional steel reinforcement principles are suitable for designing BFRP reinforcement for concrete beams. Lastly, crack propagation between BFRP and traditional steel reinforced concrete beams was compared. The results showed a very good correlation between experimental results and predicted ultimate load and deflection values obtained using traditional steel reinforcement design principles. It was found that the un-cracked sections of the BFRP reinforced concrete beam behaviour is virtually identical to steel reinforced beams, but the cracked section behaved completely differently. Also, beams reinforced with BFRP tension bars that were anchored displayed less deflection. Detailing issues using BFRP and steel hybrid reinforcement system were discovered, therefore further investigation including the proposed setup solutions from this study, needs to be carried out to determine whether they strengthen the evidence for hybrid reinforcement systems using BFRP reinforced concrete beams.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectflexural behaviouren_US
dc.subjectrebar reinforced concrete beamsen_US
dc.subjectcracked and un-cracked section behaviouren_US
dc.subjectBFRPen_US
dc.subjectreinforced concrete beamsen_US
dc.titleFlexural behaviour of BFRP rebar reinforced concrete beamsen_US
dc.typeArticle
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume10
plymouth.journalThe Plymouth Student Scientist


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV