Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorLewin, Anya
dc.contributor.authorBrown, James Alexander
dc.contributor.otherSchool of Art, Design and Architectureen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-15T11:54:58Z
dc.date.available2019-04-15T11:54:58Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier10367284en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/13712
dc.descriptionEdited version not embargoed Full version: Access restricted permanently due to 3rd party copyright restrictions. Restriction set on 15/04/2019 by AS, Doctoral College Full version will remain embargoed due to copyright AS DC
dc.description.abstract

This thesis investigates the decline of a particular form of art criticism, embodied by the English art critic and editor, Peter Fuller. Fuller’s criticism developed out of a Kantian tradition, presenting judgements of objective worth arrived at through the exercise of taste, and championed what he described as the British or English Romantic landscape tradition. Central to the decline was the displacement of art criticism and the art critic in the creation and articulation of value in art worlds. Through a historiographical study of Modern Painters, the publication founded by Fuller in 1988, the thesis explores the changing relationship between the art magazine and the art world in order to identify and analyse the complex relationships between different agents acting within it.

The thesis begins by examining Fuller’s critical position at the time he founded Modern Painters. This positions Fuller in relation both to Modernism and Modernist criticism, and to his contemporaries including John Berger. A particular focus is on Fuller’s attitudes towards history and tradition. I then assess the extent to which the magazine’s content evidences and confirms Fuller’s position as expressed through his own writing on criticism. On Fuller’s death, Karen Wright took over as editor of Modern Painters, and an editorial board was convened. The content of the magazine during this period is analysed to assess the extent to which Fuller’s values did or did not remain integral to the editorial policy and subsequent content. Modern Painters and contemporaneous publications and criticism are compared and contrasted, examining shifting contexts in art criticism.

In 1976 Fuller wrote an article for Studio International that sets out his model for a magazine unaffected by market forces. Modern Painters (under Fuller) is analysed in relation to his model. The extent to which editorial content in the magazine may or may not have been influenced by the market during his editorship is assessed, and the changing nature of the relationship between criticism and the market discussed.

An analysis of the relationship between Modern Painters, its editors and writers, and the exhibition Sensation: Young British Artist from the Saatchi Collection at the Royal Academy of Arts, and the trajectory of the magazine over the following years, reveals the changing relationships between agents within the art world, and their role in the decline and displacement of art criticism and the art critic.

en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectArt Historiography
dc.subjectArt Criticism
dc.subjectCriticism
dc.subjectPeter Fuller
dc.subjectModern Painters
dc.subjectArt Market
dc.subjectSensation
dc.subjectArt Magazines
dc.subjectMarketing
dc.subjectArt Historyen_US
dc.subject.classificationPhDen_US
dc.titlePeter Fuller, Modern Painters and the Sensation exhibitionen_US
dc.typeThesis
plymouth.versionnon-publishableen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/927
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/927
dc.type.qualificationDoctorateen_US
rioxxterms.versionNA


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV