Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCoffey, MM
dc.contributor.authorTolley, N
dc.contributor.authorHoward, D
dc.contributor.authorHickson, Mary
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-21T16:05:28Z
dc.date.issued2019-01
dc.identifier.issn1021-7762
dc.identifier.issn1421-9972
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/13201
dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: The Sunderland Tracheosophageal Voice Perceptual scale (SToPS) is the only perceptual rating scale designed specifically for tracheosophageal voice [Hurren et al.: Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Dec; 34(6): 533-8]. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the inter rater reliability of the SToPS when analyzing alaryngeal voice. METHODS: Prospective evaluation of inter rater reliability of the SToPS based on audio recordings of 230 voice samples from 41 laryngectomy patients rated by 3 experts. Interval data were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) while categorical data were analyzed using Kappa. RESULTS: ICC of above 0.6 was observed between raters for each prosthesis on a majority of parameters demonstrating a good level of reliability. Reliability was fair (ICC of between 0.40 and 0.59) on Q11 (Articulatory precision) and Q12 (Paralinguistics). Reliability was also fair (0.21-0.40) or slight (0.00-0.20) for Q2 (Tonicity), which was analyzed using Kappa. Kappa above 0.61 signified a good level of reliability. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates good rater reliability for the majority of parameters on the SToPS scale, supporting the use of this tool within the clinical realm. However, further research is required to ascertain if any methods of increasing inter rater reliability on those parameters which did not reach good reliability can be identified.

dc.format.extent16-23
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKarger Publishers
dc.subjectAlaryngeal voice
dc.subjectLaryngectomy
dc.subjectReliability
dc.titleAn Investigation of Reliability of the Sunderland Tracheosophageal Voice Perceptual Scale.
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
dc.typeValidation Study
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30513519
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume71
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalFolia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000493751
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerland
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-09-11
dc.rights.embargodate2019-12-4
dc.identifier.eissn1421-9972
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1159/000493751
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV