Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWalker, S
dc.contributor.authorAnnison, CJ
dc.contributor.authorBeckett, Sharon
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-10T18:38:43Z
dc.date.issued2019-03-01
dc.identifier.issn0264-5505
dc.identifier.issn1741-3079
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/13121
dc.description.abstract

Viewed as a culmination of broader neoliberal governance within the UK, this paper examines the impact of the government’s Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) agenda on day-to-day working cultures at the frontline of probation work. TR has brought with it extensive structural and cultural changes to probation work in England and Wales. Once a single public-sector service with a social welfare ethos of ‘advise, assist and befriend’, probation has been dismantled, partially privatised and culturally transformed into a collection of fragmented, target-driven organisations, divided according to risk and with an official rhetoric emphasising public protection.

The implications of TR are now starting to surface. While much of this attention has focused on the impact of TR on both the supervision of offenders and in terms of public protection, less research has been conducted on how these organisational changes have impacted upon staff. Drawing upon findings from qualitative research, this article suggests that deepening cuts, precarious working environments, and increasingly unmanageable caseloads inflict upon staff what we consider to be a pervasive form of systemic workplace harm, resulting in mental health issues, stress, and professional dissatisfaction.

dc.format.extent113-130
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.subjectWorkplace Harm
dc.subjectNeoliberalism)
dc.subjectPrivatisation
dc.subjectTransforming Rehabilitation (TR)
dc.subjectNational Probation Service (NPS)
dc.subjectCommunity Rehabilitation Companies (CRCs)
dc.titleTransforming Rehabilitation: The Impact of Austerity and Privatisation on Day-to-Day Cultures and Working Practices in 'Probation'
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume66
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalProbation Journal
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0264550518820670
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/School of Society and Culture
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-12-01
dc.rights.embargodate2019-1-12
dc.identifier.eissn1741-3079
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1177/0264550518820670
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-03-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV