Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcKenzie, Len
dc.contributor.authorSchofield, Cen
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-03T12:52:22Z
dc.date.available2018-12-03T12:52:22Z
dc.date.issued2018-09en
dc.identifier.issn1359-6748en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12971
dc.description.abstract

© 2018, © 2018 Association for Research in Post‐Compulsory Education (ARPCE). UK Higher education has for many years been offered to students at different institution types, one such being colleges of further education. He offered at further education colleges differs in many ways from that offered to a university. One way in which it differs greatly is the mode of provision. Traditional university degrees typically a commitment to a named three-year programme of study. Provision through colleges differs as students typically enrol on a two-year associate degree, which they  may then decide to top up to a full bachelor’s degree at either their FEC or at partnered universities (2 + 1 mode). This research sought to investigate what factors students believed to be important when making course choices, and their reflection on the course type they chose. It was found that associate degree students tended to remain at the FEC if top-up options were available, and indicated a preference for the flexibility of the 2 + 1 mode. Factors that the majority of students deemed as important in their choice of top-up course was their career potential; students remaining at colleges were also concerned about the continuity of their educational experience and course content.

en
dc.format.extent314 - 327en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge)en
dc.titleDegrees of freedom: college-based higher education students’ choices and views on the top-up mode of higher educationen
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue3en
plymouth.volume23en
plymouth.journalResearch in Post-Compulsory Educationen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13596748.2018.1490086en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-02-26en
dc.rights.embargodate2020-04-07en
dc.identifier.eissn1747-5112en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/13596748.2018.1490086en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-09en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV