Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDing, X
dc.contributor.authorZhu, L
dc.contributor.authorZhang, R
dc.contributor.authorWang, L
dc.contributor.authorWang, T-T
dc.contributor.authorLatour, Jos M
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-02T12:00:25Z
dc.date.issued2019-01
dc.identifier.issn1036-7314
dc.identifier.issn1878-1721
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12967
dc.description.abstract

Objective: To review English and Chinese randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the effects of family-centered care interventions on preterm infants’ and parental outcomes in Neonatal Intensive Care Units and to conduct a meta-analysis. Review method used: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo, BNI, AMED and the Chinese databases CNKI and Wanfang were searched in April 2017 and updated in August 2018. Review methods: Only RCTs were included. Participants were preterm infants ≤ 37 weeks gestational age and parents. Interventions were related to family-centered care and outcome measures were infant and parent clinical outcomes. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias using Cochrane Manual 5.1.0. Meta-analyses used Mean Differences (MD), Standardized Mean Differences (SMD) or Odds Ratio (OR) followed by 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Heterogeneity was tested with Cochran’s Q chi-square, tau-squared and inconsistency index (I2). Results: Included were 19 studies (10 from English and 9 from Chinese databases); meta-analysis included 15 studies (7 English and 8 Chinese RCTs). Meta-analysis showed significant improvements in weight gain (7 studies: MD 4.57; 95%CI: 2.80;6.34; P<0.001; I2 94%); readmission (3 studies: OR=0.23; 95%CI: 0.10;0.52; P<0.001; I2=0%); parent satisfaction (5 studies: OR=11.20; 95%CI: 4.76;26.34; p<0.001; I2=0%); Skills of parents (4 studies: SMD=2.57; 95%CI: 2.19;2.96; P<0.001; I2=53%); Knowledge of parents (4 studies: SMD=2.74; 95%CI: 2.47;3.00; P<0.001; I2=0%); Parental anxiety at follow-up: (3 studies: SMD=-0.19; 95%CI: -0.28;-0.09; P<0.001; I2=0%); Parent depression at follow-up: (2 studies: SMD=0.37; 95%CI: -0.63;-0.12; P=0.004; I2=44%); Parental stress: (3 studies: MD=-0.20; 95%CI: -0.26;-0.13; P<0.001; I2=0%). No statistical differences were observed in neuro-behavioral-development (3 studies) and hospital-length-of-stay (7 studies). Conclusions: Family-centered care interventions can improve weight gain and readmission in preterm infants as well as parent satisfaction, knowledge and skills, and possibly long-term anxiety, depression and stress. Developing standardized outcome sets for testing family-centered care interventions is recommended.

dc.format.extent63-75
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.subjectFamily Centered Care
dc.subjectInfant
dc.subjectMeta-Analysis
dc.subjectNeonatology
dc.subjectNursing
dc.subjectParents
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trials
dc.titleEffects of family-centered care interventions on preterm infants and parents in neonatal intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeMulticenter Study
dc.typeSystematic Review
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000454635000012&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume32
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalAustralian Critical Care
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aucc.2018.10.007
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeAustralia
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-10-28
dc.rights.embargodate2019-12-13
dc.identifier.eissn1878-1721
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionAccepted Manuscript
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.aucc.2018.10.007
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV