Probing the ground state in gauge theories
dc.contributor.author | Heinzl, Thomas | |
dc.contributor.author | Ilderton, A::0000-0002-6520-7323 | |
dc.contributor.author | Langfeld, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Lavelle, Martin | |
dc.contributor.author | Lutz, W | |
dc.contributor.author | McMullan, David | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-10T12:08:06Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-11-10T12:08:06Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-03 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1550-7998 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1550-2368 | |
dc.identifier.other | 054501 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12746 | |
dc.description | 13 pages, 10 .eps figures. V2: conclusions extended | |
dc.description.abstract |
We consider two very different models of the flux tube linking two heavy quarks: a string linking the matter fields and a Coulombic description of two separately gauge invariant charges. We compare how close they are to the unknown true ground state in compact U(1) and the SU(2) Higgs model. Simulations in compact U(1) show that the string description is better in the confined phase but the Coulombic description is best in the deconfined phase; the last result is shown to agree with analytical calculations. Surprisingly in the nonabelian theory the Coulombic description is better in both the Higgs and confined phases. This indicates a significant difference in the width of the flux tubes in the two theories. © 2008 The American Physical Society. | |
dc.format.extent | 054501- | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | American Physical Society (APS) | |
dc.subject | hep-lat | |
dc.subject | hep-lat | |
dc.subject | hep-ph | |
dc.subject | hep-th | |
dc.title | Probing the ground state in gauge theories | |
dc.type | journal-article | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
plymouth.author-url | https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000254544200054&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008 | |
plymouth.issue | 5 | |
plymouth.volume | 77 | |
plymouth.publisher-url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.054501 | |
plymouth.publication-status | Published online | |
plymouth.journal | Physical Review D | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1103/physrevd.77.054501 | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Engineering, Computing and Mathematics | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/EXTENDED UoA 10 - Mathematical Sciences | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA10 Mathematical Sciences | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role/Academics | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1550-2368 | |
dc.rights.embargoperiod | Not known | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.1103/physrevd.77.054501 | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review |