Promoting the use of outcome measures across disciplines through action research with practitioners in a palliative care setting.
dc.contributor.author | Reynolds, Sarah | |
dc.contributor.author | Bannigan, Katrina | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-11-01T16:29:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-03-20 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1741-1645 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1759-779X | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12712 | |
dc.description.abstract |
<jats:sec><jats:title>Background/Aim</jats:title><jats:p> Allied health professionals aspire to become evidence-based practitioners but disparity exists between best practice and clinical practice. One example is outcome measurement; despite being committed to using outcome measures, allied health professionals struggle to use them. This study aimed to explore the process of introducing outcome measures into a practice setting. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> A qualitative action research study was undertaken with allied health professionals working in a hospice setting. The data, collected in three cycles of action, were analysed thematically. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Findings</jats:title><jats:p> Three themes emerged: the gap between knowledge and practice, the challenges of measuring outcomes in palliative care, and facilitators to using outcome measures in palliative care. Action research provided a structure to involve therapists in introducing outcome measures within a practice setting. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p> This study provides insight into how a clinical speciality's discrete characteristics influence the process of selecting outcome measures. In a hospice setting, where people have life-shortening conditions, the challenges for using outcome measures are different to other settings. Action research offers a deep learning opportunity and process, through education, discussion, and critique, to support therapists to select and adopt the outcome measures to use in practice. </jats:p></jats:sec> | |
dc.format.extent | 1-16 | |
dc.language | en | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Mark Allen Healthcare | |
dc.subject | Behavioral and Social Science | |
dc.subject | Clinical Research | |
dc.subject | Generic health relevance | |
dc.title | Promoting the use of outcome measures across disciplines through action research with practitioners in a palliative care setting. | |
dc.type | journal-article | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
plymouth.issue | 3 | |
plymouth.volume | 26 | |
plymouth.publication-status | Published | |
plymouth.journal | International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.12968/ijtr.2017.0104 | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Health | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Research Groups | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role/Academics | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2018-10-02 | |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2019-9-20 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1759-779X | |
dc.rights.embargoperiod | Not known | |
rioxxterms.versionofrecord | 10.12968/ijtr.2017.0104 | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-03-20 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review |