Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCollinson, Avril
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, A
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, S
dc.contributor.authorDowner, C
dc.contributor.authorClemente, R
dc.contributor.authorAllan, K
dc.contributor.authorGreer, F
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-31T13:43:56Z
dc.date.issued2019-02
dc.identifier.issn1941-2452
dc.identifier.issn1941-2452
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12697
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>In a previous audit, 81% of enteral protein prescriptions failed to meet protein guidelines. To address this, a very high‐protein enteral formula and protein supplements were introduced, and protein prescriptions were adjusted to account for nonnutrition energy sources displacing enteral formula. This follow‐up audit compared protein provision in critically ill adults requiring exclusive enteral nutrition (EN), first, with local and international guidelines, and second, after changes to practice, with the previous audit in the same intensive care unit (ICU).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Data were collected from 106 adults consecutively admitted to the ICU of a U.K. tertiary hospital and requiring exclusive EN ≥3 days. Protein targets based on local guidelines (1.25, 1.5, or 2.0 g/kg/d), nutrition prescription, and delivery were recorded for 24 hours between days 1–3, 5–7, 8–10, and 18–20 post‐ICU admission.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>The proportion of day 1–3 protein prescriptions meeting protein targets increased from 19% in 2015 to 69% in 2017 (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; .0005, φ = 0.50). The median percentage of protein target delivered was lower than prescribed (79% vs 103%; (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; .0005; <jats:italic>r</jats:italic> = 0.53) and EN delivery only met the target of 22% of patients. The proportion of protein prescriptions meeting protein targets was similar for days 1–3 (69%), 5–7 (71%), and 8–10 (68%), but increased slightly by days 18–20 (74%). The proportion of patients for which EN delivery met protein targets increased with the number of days post‐ICU admission (22%, 26%, 37%, and 53% for days 1–3, 5–7, 8–10, and 18–20, respectively).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>The proportion of protein prescriptions meeting guideline targets was higher after changes to practice.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent123-130
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.subjectcritical care
dc.subjectcritical illness
dc.subjectdietary proteins
dc.subjectenteral nutrition
dc.subjectintensive care unit
dc.subjectnutrition assessment
dc.subjectnutrition support
dc.subjectquality improvement
dc.titleProtein provision in critically ill adults requiring enteral nutrition: Are guidelines being met?
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000459619900012&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume34
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalNutrition in Clinical Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ncp.10209
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Health Professions
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-09-29
dc.rights.embargodate2019-2-12
dc.identifier.eissn1941-2452
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1002/ncp.10209
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-02
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV