Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOztop, P
dc.contributor.authorLoesche, F
dc.contributor.authorMaranan, DS
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, KB
dc.contributor.authorTyagi, V
dc.contributor.authorTorre, I
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-30T10:17:33Z
dc.date.available2018-10-30T10:17:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-11-21
dc.identifier.issn2082-6710
dc.identifier.issn2082-6710
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12681
dc.descriptionCite as: Oztop, P., Loesche, F., Maranan, D. S., Francis, K. B., Tyagi, V., & Torre, I. (2017). (Not so) dangerous liaisons: A framework for evaluating collaborative research projects [Special Issue]. AVANT, 8, 167–179
dc.description.abstract

© 2017, Centre for Philosophical Research. With advances in research environments and the accompanying increase in the complexity of research projects, the range of skills required to carry out research calls for an increase in interdisciplinary and collaborative work. CogNovo, a doctoral training program for 25 PhD students, provided a unique opportunity to observe and analyze collaborative processes. We propose a process-oriented framework for understanding research collaborations along two dimensions: interpersonal and project-related. To illustrate the utility of this process-oriented framework, we apply the framework matrix to several collaborations that emerged within the CogNovo program. The framework that we introduce has several advantages over existing metrics. Firstly, we offer a process-oriented-as opposed to product-oriented-evaluation of interdisciplinary and collaborative endeavors. Secondly, we propose a means of assessment that preserves the distinctive profile (or "fingerprint") of a given collaborative project, thus capturing the uniqueness of each project and its environment.

dc.format.extent167-179
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe Centre for Philosophical Research
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.subject5003 Philosophy
dc.subject50 Philosophy and Religious Studies
dc.title(Not so) dangerous liaisons: A framework for evaluating collaborative research projects
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issueSpecial Issue
plymouth.volume8
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.26913/80s02017.0111.0016
plymouth.publication-statusPublished online
plymouth.journalAvant
dc.identifier.doi10.26913/80s02017.0111.0016
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-09-30
dc.identifier.eissn2082-6710
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.26913/80s02017.0111.0016
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-11-21
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV