Regulating Collective Management Organisations by Competition: An Incomplete Answer to the Licensing Problem?
dc.contributor.author | Hviid, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Schroff, Simone | |
dc.contributor.author | Street, J | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-15T07:17:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-10-15T07:17:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2190-3387 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12517 | |
dc.description.abstract |
While the three functions of Collective Management Organisations - to licence use, monitor use, and to collect and distribute the revenue - have traditionally been accepted as a progression towards a natural (national) monopoly, digital exploitation of music may no longer lead to such a fate. The European Commission has challenged the traditional structures through reforms that increase the degree of competition. This paper asks whether the reforms have had the desired effect and shows, through qualitative research, that at least regarding the streaming of music, competition has not delivered. Part of the reason for this may be that the services required by the now competing CMOs have changed. | |
dc.description.uri | https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-7-3-2016/4507 | |
dc.format.extent | 256-270 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | collective management organisations | |
dc.subject | Competition | |
dc.subject | EC | |
dc.subject | licensing | |
dc.subject | qualitative research | |
dc.subject | reforms | |
dc.title | Regulating Collective Management Organisations by Competition: An Incomplete Answer to the Licensing Problem? | |
dc.type | journal-article | |
dc.type | JOUR | |
plymouth.issue | 3 | |
plymouth.volume | 7 | |
plymouth.publisher-url | https://www.jipitec.eu/issues/jipitec-7-3-2016/4507 | |
plymouth.journal | Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA18 Law | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role | |
plymouth.organisational-group | /Plymouth/Users by role/Academics | |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2016-01-01 | |
dc.rights.embargoperiod | Not known | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ | |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2016 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review |