Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoulakaki, AIen
dc.contributor.authorDel Águila-Carrasco, AJen
dc.contributor.authorEsteve-Taboada, JJen
dc.contributor.authorMontés-Micó, Ren
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-20T17:39:39Z
dc.date.available2018-09-20T17:39:39Z
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.issn2222-3959en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12391
dc.description.abstract

AIM: To investigate the potential effect that odd and even-order monochromatic aberrations may have on the accommodation response of the human eye. METHODS: Eight healthy subjects with astigmatism below 1 D, best corrected visual acuity 20/20 or better and normal findings in an ophthalmic examination were enrolled. An adaptive optics system was used in order to measure the accommodation response of the subjects' eyes under different conditions: with the natural aberrations being present, and with the odd and even-order aberrations being corrected. Three measurements of accommodation response were monocularly acquired at accommodation demands ranging from 0 to 4 D (0.5 D step). RESULTS: The accommodative lag was greater for the accommodative demands of 1.5, 3, 3.5 and 4 D for the condition in which the even-order aberrations were corrected, in comparison to that obtained for the natural aberrations and corrected odd-order aberrations for the same accommodation demands. No statistically significant differences were found between the accommodation responses under the three conditions. CONCLUSION: The odd and even-order aberrations are not helping the visual system to accommodate, because their partial correction do not affect the accommodation performance.

en
dc.format.extent955 - 960en
dc.languageengen
dc.language.isoengen
dc.subjectAccommodation Responseen
dc.subjectAdaptive Opticsen
dc.subjectMonochromatic Aberrationsen
dc.titleEffect of even and odd-order aberrations on the accommodation response.en
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28730088en
plymouth.issue6en
plymouth.volume10en
plymouth.publication-statusPublished onlineen
plymouth.journalInt J Ophthalmolen
dc.identifier.doi10.18240/ijo.2017.06.19en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Health Professions
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeChinaen
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-03-07en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.18240/ijo.2017.06.19en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV