Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhite, A
dc.contributor.authorTough, L
dc.contributor.authorEyre, V
dc.contributor.authorVickery, Jane
dc.contributor.authorAsprey, A
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, Cath
dc.contributor.authorWarren, F
dc.contributor.authorPritchard, C
dc.contributor.authorFoster, NE
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, RS
dc.contributor.authorUnderwood, M
dc.contributor.authorDieppe, P
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10T11:07:06Z
dc.date.available2018-09-10T11:07:06Z
dc.date.issued2016-12
dc.identifier.issn2055-5784
dc.identifier.issn2055-5784
dc.identifier.other10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12306
dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests acupuncture may be effective for treating the symptoms of knee osteoarthritis. Offering this in a group setting may offer cost savings. The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility of a definitive trial to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of Western medical acupuncture given in groups, or given individually, for adults with severe knee pain attributable to osteoarthritis. METHODS: A pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted. Participants were recruited from seven general practices in Plymouth, Devon. Acupuncture was provided, at a dosage that increased up to and including electroacupuncture if no pain relief was reported, by one experienced acupuncturist in a community clinic. Potentially eligible adults aged at least 45 years with knee osteoarthritis were identified from practice registers, screened and randomised to either: (1) standardised advice and exercise booklet alone ('standard'); (2) booklet plus group acupuncture ('group'); and (3) booklet plus individual acupuncture ('individual'). Both acupuncture arms received up to ten treatments over 12 weeks. Recruitment, retention and data completion rates were recorded, and participants completed questionnaires on acceptability. We collected pain, stiffness and function data (using the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index; WOMAC) and general health (EQ-5D) and economic measures at baseline and 14 weeks post-randomisation. RESULTS: We screened 149 people and randomised 60 (40 %), 20 per arm. The overall 14 week follow-up rate was 77 %, but only 70 % in the 'standard' group; 4.1 % of data points were missing. The study was acceptable to participants. Changes in WOMAC pain score (intention to treat complete case analysis) from baseline to 14 week follow-up were: 'standard', 0.4 (95 % confidence interval (CI) -1.4, 2.2, n = 14); 'group' -3.2 (95 % CI -5.1, -1.4, n = 17); 'individual' -2.4 (95 % CI -4.1, -0.7, n = 15). CONCLUSIONS: A definitive three-arm trial is feasible. Further follow-up reminders, minimum data collection and incentives should be considered to improve participant retention in the follow-up processes in the standardised advice and exercise booklet arm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN05305406.

dc.format.extent10-
dc.format.mediumElectronic-eCollection
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.subjectAcupuncture
dc.subjectHealthcare delivery
dc.subjectKnee osteoarthritis
dc.subjectPilot project
dc.subjectPrimary health care
dc.subjectRandomised controlled trial
dc.titleWestern medical acupuncture in a group setting for knee osteoarthritis: results of a pilot randomised controlled trial
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27965830
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume2
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalPilot and Feasibility Studies
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40814-016-0051-5
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA20 Social Work and Social Policy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Researchers in ResearchFish submission
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-02-06
dc.identifier.eissn2055-5784
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s40814-016-0051-5
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV