Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDone, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, M
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10T07:49:07Z
dc.date.available2018-09-10T07:49:07Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-02
dc.identifier.issn0159-6306
dc.identifier.issn1469-3739
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12257
dc.description.abstract

This paper critically examines competing demands placed on teachers, with reference to recent inclusion policy in England and Australia. The authors draw on Michael Foucault’s analysis of power, neoliberalism(s) and biopolitics to explore the ways in which teachers are ‘responsibilised’ into negotiating and fulfilling demands related to both state-imposed accountability practices and social justice agendas. The economic context and associated ‘politics of austerity’ are taken into account in a critical exploration of how the (biopolitical) management of inclusion in the neoliberal present coincides with diminishing funding for social and educational expertise, with ever-increasing responsibilities being placed on teachers to fill this void. The responsibilisation of teachers in recent legislation and statutory guidance discursively constructs the teacher as a professional who takes responsibility for student and school performance, pastoral care, inclusion and social change. Responsibilisation relies on ‘dividing practices’, obliging some teachers to assess the conformity of colleagues to inclusion policy.

dc.format.extent142-155
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInforma UK Limited
dc.subjectFoucault
dc.subjecteducational neoliberalisation
dc.subjectinclusion
dc.subjectresponsibilisation
dc.subjectdividing practices
dc.subjectbiopolitics
dc.titleThe responsibilisation of teachers: a neoliberal solution to the problem of inclusion
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000428752100011&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume39
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalDiscourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01596306.2016.1243517
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/Plymouth Institute of Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA23 Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.identifier.eissn1469-3739
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/01596306.2016.1243517
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV