Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStruthers, R
dc.contributor.authorErasmus, P
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, K
dc.contributor.authorWarman, P
dc.contributor.authorCollingwood, A
dc.contributor.authorSneyd, John
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-09T22:09:07Z
dc.date.available2012-11-09T22:09:07Z
dc.date.issued2008-12
dc.identifier.issn0007-0912
dc.identifier.issn1471-6771
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/1222
dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: Morbidity and mortality are higher in patients with poor preoperative cardiorespiratory reserve. This study aimed to ascertain fitness and therefore risk in elective patients, comparing three measures: Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) questionnaire, incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), and cycle cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). We looked for correlation between the measures and for thresholds on the questionnaire or shuttle test which could identify fit patients and render CPET unnecessary. METHODS: A prospective cohort trial of 50 patients having intra-abdominal surgery. Each performed DASI, ISWT, and CPET during a single visit to the hospital. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between measured oxygen consumption and both ISWT and DASI. Receiver operator curve showed both the shuttle walk test and the DASI are sensitive and specific predictors of VO(2)peak >15 ml O(2) kg(-1) min(-1) and anaerobic threshold (AT) >11 ml O(2) kg(-1) min(-1). Thirty-two patients would be considered lower risk, having achieved both VO(2)peak and AT cut-offs. Setting an ISWT threshold of 360 m identified 13 of the lower risk patients [positive predictive value (PPV) 1.0, negative predictive value (NPV) 0.49]. Setting a DASI threshold score of 46 identified nine lower risk patients (PPV 1.0, NPV 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant correlation between the tests. However, many patients with poor questionnaire scores or shuttle walks had satisfactory CPET results. Hence, the ability of either simple test to determine risk in a heterogeneous surgical population is poor. CPET provides an objective measurement of cardiopulmonary fitness; however, evidence for this information improving patient outcome is limited and requires further research.

dc.format.extent774-780
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subjectassessment
dc.subjectpreanaesthetic
dc.subjectcardiorespiratory system
dc.subjectresponses
dc.subjectmetabolism
dc.subjectoxygen consumption
dc.subjectoxygen
dc.subjectuptake
dc.subjectsurgery
dc.subjectabdominal
dc.titleAssessing fitness for surgery: a comparison of questionnaire, incremental shuttle walk, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in general surgical patients
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeComparative Study
dc.typeEvaluation Study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000260971500005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue6
plymouth.volume101
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBritish Journal of Anaesthesia
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/bja/aen310
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dc.identifier.eissn1471-6771
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1093/bja/aen310
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV