Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorColquhoun1, B
dc.contributor.authorLord, A
dc.contributor.authorBacon, Alison
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-20T08:53:58Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-01
dc.identifier.issn2473-2850
dc.identifier.issn2473-2842
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12180
dc.description.abstract

This study presents a qualitative, user-focused evaluation of a three-day dramatherapy workshop run as part of an 18-week treatment group for mentally disordered sexual offenders (MDSOs). The programme is based in the Good Lives Model and aims overall to increase empathy, victim awareness and emotional awareness. The objective of the present study was to understand offenders’ lived experiences of the workshop and how they perceived it to contribute to their recovery. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with five offenders and their narratives transcribed. An Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis, revealed four superordinate themes which we have termed Not being the person I was, Gaining new perspectives, Social Relationships and Barriers. These themes lend support to recent research on treatment and behaviour change in sexual offenders emphasising responsivity and process issues. This study draws particular emphasis to the need to encourage group cohesion and trust, and highlights issues relating to peer comparisons which may impede new perspectives on personal identity and rationale for change. The study also found barriers to change in some participants including impression management, memory problems and varying levels of attraction or, conversely aversion, to dramatherapy techniques. Practical implications for the effective delivery of sex offender treatment groups in the context of personal recovery from mental disorder and offending are discussed.

dc.format.extent352-373
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis
dc.subjectGood Lives Model
dc.subjectMentally disordered sex offenders
dc.subjectRecovery processes
dc.subjectDramatherapy
dc.subjectIPA
dc.titleA Qualitative Evaluation of Recovery Processes Experienced by Mentally Disordered Offenders following a Group Treatment Programme
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000452643600002&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue5
plymouth.volume18
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/24732850.2018.1510280
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Psychology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience/UoA04 REF peer reviewers
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)/Behaviour
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-08-01
dc.rights.embargodate2019-9-10
dc.identifier.eissn2473-2842
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1080/24732850.2018.1510280
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-12-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV