Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZainab, S
dc.contributor.authorPan, W
dc.contributor.authorGoodhew, Steve
dc.contributor.authorFuertes, Alba
dc.contributor.editorSmith SD
dc.contributor.editorAhiaga-Dagbui DD
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-13T09:57:56Z
dc.date.available2018-08-13T09:57:56Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-02
dc.identifier.isbn9780955239076
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/12016
dc.descriptionFulltext in: http://www.arcom.ac.uk/-docs/proceedings/ar2013-1219-1229_Zainab_Pan_Goodhew_Fuertes.pdf
dc.description.abstract

In the design and construction of sustainable retail buildings, there are various stakeholders involved with the overall aim of selecting appropriate sustainable technologies to reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions. Previous studies and literature review indicate there is no comprehensive selection process to assist stakeholders. This can be classified as a complex multi-criteria decision problem due to the high number of alternatives, potential solutions and variety of stakeholders (e.g. clients, professional advisors, end-users) with multiple, often conflicting, objectives leading in turn to the slow take-up of sustainable technologies. There is a demand for a systematic and effective evaluation tool for the selection of sustainable technologies based on the needs of stakeholders. This paper is part of an on-going study to develop a decision making system to assist stakeholders in the selection process and aims to establish the decision criteria for the selection of sustainable technologies for existing retail buildings based on the clients' (retailers') perspective. The arguments are informed by a combination of literature review and an in-depth case study with a leading construction company in the UK. The data collected was both qualitative (establishing and verifying decision criteria) and quantitative (establishing weightings and priorities). Five broad decision criteria currently used by clients in the selection of sustainable technologies to achieve reductions in energy and carbon were established (i.e. cost, time, proven success of technology, risk and sustainability). Using AHP survey and expert opinions, the identified criteria were weighted and ranked, with risk (37%) being the most important, followed by cost (22%), proven success (20%) and time (12%), and sustainability (9%) the least important factor. Although the established criteria would be most relevant for the selection of sustainable technologies for existing retail buildings, it will also be beneficial for new build retail buildings and be transferable to other types of buildings.

dc.format.extent1219-1229
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherAssociation of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM).
dc.titleStakeholders perspective on sustainable technology selection to achieve zero carbon retail buildings
dc.typeconference
dc.typeConference Proceeding
plymouth.date-start2013-09-02
plymouth.date-finish2012-09-04
plymouth.conference-name29th Annual ARCOM Conference
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalProceedings 29th Annual Association of Researchers in Construction Management Conference, ARCOM 2013
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA13 Architecture, Built Environment and Planning
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeReading UK
dc.publisher.placeUK
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeConference Paper/Proceeding/Abstract


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV