What place has grammar in the English curriculum? An analysis of ninety years’ policy debate: 1921 to 2011.
Date
2012Author
Subject
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Since 1921 England’s governments have commissioned enquiries into English and literacy teaching, leading towards published recommendations and requirements for English grammar teaching. Governments’ officially sanctioned publications represent their policy aspirations for English and literacy. Research studies have explored the subsequent challenge for schools and teachers who must integrate grammar into a subject whose wider philosophies may conflict with an explicit grammar element. My study draws on critical theory to analyse the ideological discourses of English grammar these official policy documents reveal, and how they conflict or coincide with wider ideologies of English and literacy in schools.
My study uses a two-stage analysis. First is an intertextual analysis using a corpus approach to identify the data’s grammar topics through its keywords and argumentation types. Second is a qualitative critical discourse analysis (CDA) of the documents’ main ideas and ideological discourses. The CDA analysis reveals three main ideological discourses of grammar, namely of ‘heritage and authority’, ‘standards and control’, and ‘life chances and skills’. These discourses are constructed from both prescriptive and descriptive traditions of linguistic thinking, and draw on ideological perspectives of teaching and teachers, learning and learners, and changing philosophies of English over time.
The findings show no direct connection between the topic keywords policy authors use and the ideological positions they adopt. But there is a clear trend in argumentation approaches used to make hoped-for claims for grammar’s place and benefits in subject English. The discourses found question whether teachers are sufficiently prepared for grammar teaching and whether learners are sufficiently prepared for communicating in the workplace. The policy ideologies of grammar found in the qualitative analysis are finally re-mapped against wider philosophies of subject English to identify the broad policy trends.
Collections
Publisher
Commissioning body
The following license files are associated with this item:
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
"Physical education", "health and physical education", "physical literacy" and "health literacy": Global nomenclature confusion.
Lynch, TJ; Soukup,, GJ (Taylor & Francis, 2016-08-05)The title “physical education” (PE) is the traditional taxonomy used to represent the education discipline. Health and physical education (HPE) is regarded to be an all-encompassing health-dimensional title that has been ... -
Embedding International Aspects into Curriculum Design and Delivery
Magne, PJ (Royal College of Surgeons, London, 2015-03-12) -
A case study of 'internationalisation at home' leading to a proposal for Critical Global Pedagogies
Magne, Pollyanna (University of Plymouth, 2019)This thesis examines current practice around ‘internationalisation at home’ (Jones, 2014). This is contextualised in single case study institution, in an isolated region of the UK, and takes place following the Brexit ...