Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDubey, R
dc.contributor.authorGunasekaran, A
dc.contributor.authorChilde, Stephen J
dc.contributor.authorPapadopoulos, T
dc.contributor.authorHelo, P
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-13T20:25:13Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0025-1747
dc.identifier.issn1758-6070
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/11658
dc.description.abstract

With considerable international awareness of circular economy (CE), the purpose of the study is to propose a theoretical framework, informed by institutional theory and upper echelon theory, to explain how top management commitment mediates the relationship between external pressures and supplier relationship management (SRM) practices for circular economy. We test our hypotheses using cross-sectional data gathered using a survey of companies involved in sustainability practices. The results of the hierarchical regression and mediating regression analyses suggest that top management commitment positively mediates the effect of external institutional pressures on supplier relationship management. We advance existing theory by integrating institutional theory and upper echelon theory to explain SRM practices in sustainable supply networks. Furthermore, we offer guidance to managers who would like to engage in leveraging supplier relationship management in sustainable supply networks and outline future research directions.

dc.format.extent767-790
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEmerald
dc.subjectSustainability
dc.subjectSupply Chain Management
dc.subjectSupplier Relationship Management
dc.subjectInstitutional Theory
dc.subjectUpper Echelon Theory
dc.subjectHierarchical Regression
dc.titleSupplier Relationship Management for Circular Economy: Influence of External Pressures and Top Management Commitment
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000463801600001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue4
plymouth.volume57
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalManagement Decision
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/MD-04-2018-0396
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/Plymouth Business School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA17 Business and Management Studies
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-06-13
dc.rights.embargodate2019-4-10
dc.identifier.eissn1758-6070
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1108/MD-04-2018-0396
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV