Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHe, S-W
dc.contributor.authorXiong, Y-E
dc.contributor.authorZhu, L-H
dc.contributor.authorLv, B
dc.contributor.authorGao, X-R
dc.contributor.authorXiong, H
dc.contributor.authorWang, H
dc.contributor.authorShi, H-R
dc.contributor.authorLatour, Jos M
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-07T12:39:46Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-05
dc.identifier.issn1720-8424
dc.identifier.issn1824-7288
dc.identifier.other65
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/11624
dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: Most Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) in China have restricted visiting policies for parents. This also implicates that parents are not involved in the care of their infant. Family Integrated Care (FIC), empowering parents in direct care delivery and decisions, is becoming the standard in NICUs in many countries and can improve quality-of-life and health outcomes of preterm infants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a FIC intervention on the clinical outcomes of preterm infants with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD). METHODS: A pre-post intervention study was conducted at NICUs in two Chinese children's hospitals. Infants with BPD were included: pre-intervention group (n = 134) from December 2015 to September 2016, post-intervention (FIC) group (n = 115) and their parents from October 2016 to June 2017. NICU nurses were trained between July and September 2016 to deliver the FIC intervention, including parent education and support. Parents had to be present and care for their infant minimal three hours a day. The infants' outcome measures were length-of-stay, breastfeeding, weight gain, respiratory and oxygen support, and parent hospital expenses. RESULTS: Compared with control group (n = 134), the FIC group (n = 115) had significantly increased breastfeeding rates (83% versus 71%, p = 0.030), breastfeeding time (31 days versus 19 days, p < 0.001), enteral nutrition time (50 days versus 34 days, p < 0.001), weight gain (29 g/day versus 23 g/day, p = 0.002), and significantly lower respiratory support time (16 days versus 25 days, p < 0.001). Oxygen Exposure Time decreased but not significant (39 days versus 41 days p = 0.393). Parents hospital expenses in local Chinese RMB currency was not significant (84 K versus 88 K, p = 0.391). CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggests that FIC is feasible in two Chinese NICUs and might improve clinical outcomes of preterm infants with BPD. Further research is needed to include all infants admitted to NICUs and should include parent reported outcome measures. Our study may help other NICUs with limited parental access to implement FIC to enhance parental empowerment and involvement in the care of their infant.

dc.format.extent65-
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.subjectBronchopulmonary dysplasia
dc.subjectClinical outcome
dc.subjectFamily integrated care
dc.subjectFamily centered care
dc.subjectIntensive care
dc.subjectNeonatology
dc.subjectParents
dc.subjectPreterm infants
dc.titleImpact of family integrated care on infants’ clinical outcomes in two children’s hospitals in China: a pre-post intervention study
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeComparative Study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeMulticenter Study
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000434178900001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume44
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalItalian Journal of Pediatrics
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13052-018-0506-9
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-05-28
dc.rights.embargodate2018-6-15
dc.identifier.eissn1824-7288
dc.rights.embargoperiodNo embargo
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1186/s13052-018-0506-9
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-06-05
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV