Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilson, ADMen
dc.contributor.authorHayden, TAen
dc.contributor.authorVandergoot, CSen
dc.contributor.authorKraus, RTen
dc.contributor.authorDettmers, JMen
dc.contributor.authorCooke, SJen
dc.contributor.authorKrueger, CCen
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-09T08:58:44Z
dc.date.available2018-05-09T08:58:44Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-01en
dc.identifier.issn0906-6691en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/11422
dc.description.abstract

© 2016 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd Electronic tags have become a common tool in fish research, enhancing our understanding of how fish interact with their environment and move among different habitats, for estimating mortality and recording internal physiological states. An often-untested assumption of electronic tagging studies is that tagged fish are representative of untagged conspecifics and thus show ‘normal’ behaviour (e.g. movement rates, swimming activity, feeding). Here, we use a unique data set for potamadromous walleye (Sander vitreus) in Lake Huron and Lake Erie tributaries to assess whether the lack of appropriate controls in electronic tagging could seriously affect behavioural data. We used fish tagged in previous years and compared their migratory behaviour during the spawning season to fish tagged in a current year at the same location. The objective of the study was to determine whether intracoelomic acoustic tag implantation altered downstream movement of walleye after spawning. Fish tagged in a given season travelled slower downstream from two river spawning sites than fish tagged in previous years. Fish tagged one or two years earlier showed no differences between each other in downstream travel time, in contrast to fish tagged in a given year. Our results support notions that standard collection and intracoelomic tagging procedures can alter short-term behaviour (i.e. days, weeks, months), and as such, researchers should use caution when interpreting data collected over such time periods. Further, whenever possible, researchers should also explicitly evaluate post-tagging effects on behaviour as part of their experimental objectives.

en
dc.format.extent292 - 300en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleDo intracoelomic telemetry transmitters alter the post-release behaviour of migratory fish?en
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue2en
plymouth.volume26en
plymouth.publication-statusPublisheden
plymouth.journalEcology of Freshwater Fishen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/eff.12275en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Biological and Marine Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA07 Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.identifier.eissn1600-0633en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNo embargoen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/eff.12275en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV