Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNimmerichter, A
dc.contributor.authorNovak, N
dc.contributor.authorTriska, C
dc.contributor.authorPrinz, B
dc.contributor.authorBreese, Brynmor
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-01T12:16:58Z
dc.date.available2018-05-01T12:16:58Z
dc.date.issued2017-03
dc.identifier.issn1064-8011
dc.identifier.issn1533-4287
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/11383
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Nimmerichter, A, Novak, N, Triska, C, Prinz, B, and Breese, BC. Validity of treadmill-derived critical speed on predicting 5,000-meter track-running performance. <jats:italic toggle="yes">J Strength Cond Res</jats:italic> 31(3): 706–714, 2017—To evaluate 3 models of critical speed (CS) for the prediction of 5,000-m running performance, 16 trained athletes completed an incremental test on a treadmill to determine maximal aerobic speed (MAS) and 3 randomly ordered runs to exhaustion at the ∆70% intensity, at 110% and 98% of MAS. Critical speed and the distance covered above CS (<jats:italic toggle="yes">D′</jats:italic>) were calculated using the hyperbolic speed-time (HYP), the linear distance-time (LIN), and the linear speed inverse-time model (INV). Five thousand meter performance was determined on a 400-m running track. Individual predictions of 5,000-m running time (t = [5,000−<jats:italic toggle="yes">D′</jats:italic>]/CS) and speed (<jats:italic toggle="yes">s</jats:italic> = <jats:italic toggle="yes">D’</jats:italic>/t + CS) were calculated across the 3 models in addition to multiple regression analyses. Prediction accuracy was assessed with the standard error of estimate (SEE) from linear regression analysis and the mean difference expressed in units of measurement and coefficient of variation (%). Five thousand meter running performance (speed: 4.29 ± 0.39 m·s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>; time: 1,176 ± 117 seconds) was significantly better than the predictions from all 3 models (<jats:italic toggle="yes">p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001). The mean difference was 65–105 seconds (5.7–9.4%) for time and −0.22 to −0.34 m·s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> (−5.0 to −7.5%) for speed. Predictions from multiple regression analyses with CS and <jats:italic toggle="yes">D′</jats:italic> as predictor variables were not significantly different from actual running performance (−1.0 to 1.1%). The SEE across all models and predictions was approximately 65 seconds or 0.20 m·s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> and is therefore considered as moderate. The results of this study have shown the importance of aerobic and anaerobic energy system contribution to predict 5,000-m running performance. Using estimates of CS and <jats:italic toggle="yes">D′</jats:italic> is valuable for predicting performance over race distances of 5,000 m.</jats:p>

dc.format.extent706-714
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
dc.subjectcritical power
dc.subjectanaerobic work capacity
dc.subjectperformance prediction
dc.subjectexercise testing
dc.titleValidity of Treadmill-Derived Critical Speed on Predicting 5000-Meter Track-Running Performance
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeRandomized Controlled Trial
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000394569600018&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume31
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/jsc.0000000000001529
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Biomedical Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CBR
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dc.identifier.eissn1533-4287
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1519/jsc.0000000000001529
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV