Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUkoumunne, OC
dc.contributor.authorVaidya, B
dc.contributor.authorFrost, J
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, R
dc.contributor.authorArgyle, C
dc.contributor.authorDaly, M
dc.contributor.authorHarris-Golesworthy, F
dc.contributor.authorHarris, J
dc.contributor.authorGibson, A
dc.contributor.authorIngram, Wendy
dc.contributor.authorPinkney, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorVickery, Jane
dc.contributor.authorBritten, N
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-25T12:16:05Z
dc.date.available2018-04-25T12:16:05Z
dc.date.issued2017-03-07
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.othere013519
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/11343
dc.description.abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of running a randomised controlled trial of a preconsultation web-based intervention (Presenting Asking Checking Expressing (PACE-D)) to improve the quality of care and clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes. DESIGN AND SETTING: A feasibility study (with randomisation) conducted at outpatient diabetes clinics at two secondary care hospitals in Devon, UK. PARTICIPANTS: People with diabetes (type 1 and type 2) attending secondary care general diabetes outpatient clinics. INTERVENTION: The PACE-D, a web-based tool adapted for patients with diabetes to use before their consultation to generate an agenda of topics to discuss with their diabetologist. OUTCOMES: The percentage of eligible patients who were recruited and the percentage of participants for whom routine glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) data (the putative primary outcome) could be extracted from medical notes and who completed secondary outcome assessments via questionnaire at follow-up were reported. RESULTS: In contrast with the planned recruitment of 120 participants, only 71 participants were randomised during the 7-month recruitment period. This comprised 18.7% (95% CI 14.9% to 23.0%) of those who were eligible. Mean (SD) age of the participants was 56.5 (12.4) years and 66.2% had type 1 diabetes. Thirty-eight patients were randomised to the intervention arm and 33 to the control arm. HbA1c data were available for only 73% (95% CI 61% to 83%) of participants at the 6 months follow-up. The questionnaire-based data were collected for 66% (95% CI 54% to 77%) of the participants at 6 months follow-up. Participants reported that the PACE-D tool was easy to use. CONCLUSIONS: A randomised controlled trial of the preconsultation web-based intervention as set out in our current protocol is not feasible without significant modification to improve recruitment and follow-up of participants. The study also provides insights into the feasibility and challenges of conducting complex intervention trials in everyday clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN75070242.

dc.format.extente013519-e013519
dc.format.mediumElectronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.subjectdiabetes
dc.subjectpatient enablement
dc.subjectpre-consultation
dc.subjectself-management
dc.subjectAmbulatory Care Facilities
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitus
dc.subjectFeasibility Studies
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studies
dc.subjectGlycated Hemoglobin
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInternet
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectOutcome Assessment, Health Care
dc.subjectProgram Evaluation
dc.subjectReferral and Consultation
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnaires
dc.subjectUnited Kingdom
dc.titleA preconsultation web-based tool to generate an agenda for discussion in diabetes outpatient clinics to improve patient outcomes (DIAT): a feasibility study
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeMulticenter Study
dc.typeRandomized Controlled Trial
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000398959400081&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue3
plymouth.volume7
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalBMJ Open
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013519
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/FoH - Community and Primary Care
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-02-10
dc.rights.embargodate2021-11-27
dc.identifier.eissn2044-6055
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013519
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-03-07
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV