Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKirsch, BM
dc.contributor.authorBurke, L
dc.contributor.authorHobart, J
dc.contributor.authorAngulo, D
dc.contributor.authorWalker, PS
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-28T08:54:26Z
dc.date.issued2018-07
dc.identifier.issn1545-9616
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/11190
dc.descriptionContent published in the Journal of Drugs in Dermatology (JDD) — which is supplied either in print or digital form, including but not limited to: the printed journal (including supplements); pre-reprints; reprints; e-prints; online articles, portion of journal or entire issue; digital proofs (pdf or any other format); and any other forms — may NOT be copied, scanned, digitally captured, modified, reproduced, uploaded, posted, republished, transmitted, stored, archived, or distributed in any way unless such use is specifically permitted via a signed, duly authorized agreement. No part of JDD content may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by any means now known or hereafter developed, without prior written permission of the publisher.
dc.description.abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis (AHH) suffer from a variety of symptoms. Improved patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are needed to better assess and categorize the severity of AHH symptoms experienced by patients because the widely used Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) is a single-item measure that cannot capture the broad scope of disease impact. METHODS: The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Measure-Axillary (HDSM-Ax) was developed for determining the severity of excessive sweating in patients with primary focal AHH based on face-to-face concept elicitation interviews with 58 AHH patients, a literature review, and expert clinical input. Two waves of face-to-face cognitive interviews (n=26 and n=27) were conducted to evaluate HDSM-Ax clarity and relevance. Additional interviews (n=5) were conducted to confirm content. Adding Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) analyses allowed for an iterative streamlined approach to documenting content validity and other cross-sectional measurement properties of the new HDSM-Ax measurement. RESULTS: The 11-item HDSM-Ax PRO scale (0-4 scale per item; 0-44 total scale) represents an AHH symptom range of 0 (no sweating) to 44 (worst possible sweating). Content validity of the HDSM-Ax was documented by showing that chronologically-grouped interviews demonstrated saturation in AHH symptom severity concepts. Cognitive debriefing interviews provided evidence that item content is complete, comprehensible, meaningful, and relevant. RMT-based exploration indicated that targeting of the HDSM-Ax was adequate, suggesting good matching between items and persons; item fit was adequate, suggesting a clinically cohesive scale; and items appeared to be stable between subgroups, thereby supporting a summary score. CONCLUSIONS: The HDSM-Ax is a well-developed measure of AHH severity based on patient-reported signs and symptoms. It is a superior measure to the HDSS and can be used in clinical research and clinical practice to quantify changes in symptom severity in response to treatment. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(7):707-714.

dc.format.extent707-714
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherStrategic Communication in Dermatology
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectAxilla
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studies
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectHyperhidrosis
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectPatient Reported Outcome Measures
dc.subjectQuality of Life
dc.subjectSeverity of Illness Index
dc.subjectTelephone
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.titleThe Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Measure-Axillary: Conceptualization and Development of Item Content
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeComparative Study
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeValidation Study
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000453940700001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue7
plymouth.volume17
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalJournal of Drugs in Dermatology
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/Peninsula Medical School
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Translational and Stratified Medicine (ITSMED)/CCT&PS
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeUnited States
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-02-14
dc.rights.embargodate9999-12-31
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-07
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV