Codesigning a Measure of Person-Centred Coordinated Care to Capture the Experience of the Patient: The Development of the P3CEQ
Date
2018-01-17Author
Subject
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
<jats:sec><jats:title>Background:</jats:title><jats:p> Person-centred coordinated care (P3C) is a priority for stakeholders (ie, patients, carers, professionals, policy makers). As a part of the development of an evaluation framework for P3C, we set out to identify patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) suitable for routine measurement and feedback during the development of services. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p> A rapid review of the literature was undertaken to identity existing PREMs suitable for the probing person-centred and/or coordinated care. Of 74 measures identified, 7 met our inclusion criteria. We critically examined these against core domains and subdomains of P3C. Measures were then presented to stakeholders in codesign workshops to explore acceptability, utility, and their strengths/weaknesses. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p> The Long-Term Condition 6 questionnaire was preferred for its short length, utility, and tone. However, it lacked key questions in each core domain, and in response to requests from our codesign group, new questions were added to cover consideration as a whole person, coordination, care plans, carer involvement, and a single coordinator. Cognitive interviews, on-going codesign, and mapping to core P3C domains resulted in the refinement of the questionnaire to 11 items with 1 trigger question. The 11-item modified version was renamed the P3C Experiences Questionnaire. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions:</jats:title><jats:p> Due to a dearth of brief measures available to capture people’s experience of P3C for routine practice, an existing measure was modified using an iterative process of adaption and validation through codesign workshops. Next steps include psychometric validation and modification for people with dementia and learning difficulties. </jats:p></jats:sec>
Collections
Publisher
Place of Publication
Journal
Volume
Issue
Pagination
Recommended, similar items
The following license files are associated with this item:
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
A systematic review of effectiveness of interventions applicable to radiotherapy that are administered to improve patient comfort, increase patient compliance, and reduce patient distress or anxiety
Goldsworthy, S; Palmer, S; Latour, Jos M; McNair, H; Cramp, M (ElsevierNetherlands, 2020-03-31)OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to search existing literature to identify comfort interventions that can be used to assist an adult patient to undergo complex radiotherapy requiring positional stability for periods ... -
PAin SoluTions In the Emergency Setting (PASTIES)--patient controlled analgesia versus routine care in emergency department patients with non-traumatic abdominal pain: randomised trial
Zhu, Chengyong; Rockett, M; Creanor, Siobhan; Squire, R; Hayward, C; Ewings, P; barton, andy; Pritchard, C; Eyre, V; Cocking, Laura; Benger, J (BMJEngland, 2015-06-21)OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patient controlled analgesia (PCA) is better than routine care in providing effective analgesia for patients presenting to emergency departments with moderate to severe non-traumatic abdominal ... -
PAIN SOLUTION IN THE EMERGENCY SETTING (PASTIES); AN OPEN-LABEL RANDOMISED TRIAL OF PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA (PCA) VERSUS ROUTINE CARE IN PATIENTS ATTENDING THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT WITH TRAUMATIC INJURIES
Zhu, Chengyong; Rockett, M; Squire, R; Hayward, C; Creanor, Siobhan; Ewings, P; barton, andy; Pritchard, C; Benger, J (BMJEngland, 2014-09)Pain is the commonest reason that patients present to an Emergency Department (ED), but is often not treated effectively. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) is used in other hospital settings but there is little evidence ...