Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCox, Geoff
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-03T09:27:01Z
dc.date.available2012-08-03T09:27:01Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifierNot availableen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/1103
dc.description.abstract

Software art refers to the production of software as art rather than the use of software to produce art. This thesis situates software arts practice in relation to a dialectical materialist tradition that focusses attention on the site of production and the contradictions within the relations of production. By making reference to post-Marxist theories, it is argued that antagonisms associated with traditional forms of labour have been extended to include the labour of machines and software. Therefore any analysis of the labour involved in making art must recognise the ways in which labour has become more immaterial, collective and communicative. In the case of software art, both the programmer and : I I ~Ii program can be seen to work, and produce artwork as software. Software art thereby holds the potential to make apparent the contradictions - -I il within the relations of production, as well as the potential to be programmed to act in a disruptive manner. That software art demonstrates emergent properties is substantiated by referring to both systems theory and dialectics, that share a common interest in dynamic processes and trans formative agency. Consequently, the term 'software praxis' is proposed to characterise the I .~ 'I l combination of creative and critical activity embodied in trans formative action. It is the assertion of this thesis that software art praxis can offer new critical forms of arts practice by embodying contradictions in " I ;/ !"i the interplay between code and action. Contradiction is also embodied in the form this PhD submission takes: it is both a thesis in itself and, , like software, ready to express its dialectical potential once executed. This thesis takes the conventional form of academic writing and a program script written in Perl. It collapses form and content by presenting a thesis _about_ software art that is simultaneously an example _of_ software art. Both the text and the program script can be interpreted and acted upon. The PhD submission includes references to a number of essays written during the registration period, and those that relate closely to the main argument are attached. Also included is documentation of three collaborative projects: the exhibition _Generator_, the publication _Notes Towards the Complete Works of Shakespeare_, and The UK Museum of Ordure's _Audio Library_ installation. These projects are represented by print-outs of web pages and video documentation on DVD. Although referred to in the text, the projects do not illustrate the thesis but embody its argument. Similarly, the text is not a linked narrative to these projects but an example of software art practice in itself. In form and content, the thesis expresses a dialectics of software art.

en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouthen_US
dc.titleantiTHESIS: the dialectics of software arten_US
dc.typeThesis
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.24382/1457


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV