Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPerez-Gracia, JLen
dc.contributor.authorLoriot, Yen
dc.contributor.authorRosenberg, JEen
dc.contributor.authorPowles, Ten
dc.contributor.authorNecchi, Aen
dc.contributor.authorHussain, SAen
dc.contributor.authorMorales-Barrera, Ren
dc.contributor.authorRetz, MMen
dc.contributor.authorNiegisch, Gen
dc.contributor.authorDurán, Ien
dc.contributor.authorThéodore, Cen
dc.contributor.authorGrande, Een
dc.contributor.authorShen, Xen
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jen
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Ben
dc.contributor.authorDerleth, CLen
dc.contributor.authorvan der Heijden, MSen
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-06T13:03:16Z
dc.date.available2018-03-06T13:03:16Z
dc.date.issued2018-03en
dc.identifier.issn0302-2838en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/10983
dc.description.abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) who progress after platinum-based chemotherapy have had few treatment options and uniformly poor outcomes. Atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1) was approved in the USA for cisplatin-ineligible and platinum-treated mUC based on IMvigor210, a phase 2, single-arm, two-cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab by the number of prior lines of systemic therapy in patients with pretreated mUC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: IMvigor210 enrolled 315 patients with mUC with progression during or following platinum-based therapy at 70 international sites between May 2014 and November 2014. Key inclusion criteria included age ≥18 yr, creatinine clearance ≥30ml/min, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1, with no limit on prior lines of treatment. INTERVENTION: Patients in this cohort received atezolizumab 1200mg intravenously every 3 wk until loss of clinical benefit. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Centrally assessed Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors v1.1 objective response rate (ORR), median duration of response, overall survival (OS), and adverse events were evaluated by prior treatment. Potential differences between subgroups were evaluated using log-rank (for OS) and chi-square (for ORR and adverse events frequencies) testing. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Three hundred and ten patients were efficacy and safety evaluable (median follow-up, 21 mo). Objective responses and prolonged OS occurred across all prespecified subgroups; median duration of response was not reached in most subgroups. In patients without prior systemic mUC therapy (first-line subgroup), ORR was 25% (95% confidence interval: 14-38), and median OS was 9.6 mo (95% confidence interval: 5.9-15.8). No significant differences in efficacy or toxicity by therapy line were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Atezolizumab demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety in previously treated patients with mUC across all lines of therapy evaluated. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated effects of previous treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma that progressed after platinum-based therapy. Atezolizumab was active and tolerable no matter how many treatment regimens patients had received. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02108652.

en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.subjectAtezolizumaben
dc.subjectImmunotherapyen
dc.subjectNumber of prior regimensen
dc.subjectPrevious platinum-based chemotherapyen
dc.subjectUrothelial carcinomaen
dc.titleAtezolizumab in Platinum-treated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Outcomes by Prior Number of Regimens.en
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29273410en
plymouth.publication-statusPublished onlineen
plymouth.journalEuropean Urologyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.023en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA01 Clinical Medicine
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA01 Clinical Medicine/UoA01 Clinical Medicine
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-11-27en
dc.rights.embargodate2018-12-20en
dc.identifier.eissn1873-7560en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.eururo.2017.11.023en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-03en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV