Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLangley, G
dc.contributor.authorSchmollgruber, S
dc.contributor.authorFulbrook, P
dc.contributor.authorAlbarran, JW
dc.contributor.authorLatour, Jos M
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-27T10:12:11Z
dc.date.available2018-02-27T10:12:11Z
dc.date.issued2014-01
dc.identifier.issn1362-1017
dc.identifier.issn1478-5153
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/10873
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Care of patients at the end‐of‐life (<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EOL</jats:styled-content>) may be influenced by the experiences, attitudes and beliefs of nurses involved in their direct care.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Aim</jats:title><jats:p>To investigate South African critical care nurses' experiences and perceptions of <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EOL</jats:styled-content> care.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>Cross‐sectional survey.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>South African critical care nurses completed a modified version of the ‘<jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">VENICE</jats:styled-content>’ survey tool. Data were collected concerning: attitudes towards <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EOL</jats:styled-content> care; involvement in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EOL</jats:styled-content> decision‐making; and beliefs about <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EOL</jats:styled-content> practices.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Of 149 surveys distributed, 100 were returned (response rate 67%). Seventy‐six percent stated that they had had direct involvement in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EOL</jats:styled-content> care of patients, but a minority (29%) had participated in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EOL</jats:styled-content> decision‐making processes. Whilst most nurses (86%) were committed to family involvement in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EOL</jats:styled-content> decisions, less than two thirds (62%) reported this as routine practice. When withdrawing treatment, around half (54%) of the respondents indicated they would decrease the inspired oxygen level to room air, and the majority (84%) recommended giving effective pain relief. Continued nutritional support (84%) and hydration (85%) were advocated, with most nurses (62%) indicating that they were against keeping patients deeply sedated. Most respondents (68%) felt patients should remain in intensive care at the end of life, with the majority (72%) supporting open‐visiting, no restriction on number of family members visiting (70%), and the practising of religious or traditional cultural <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EOL</jats:styled-content> rituals (93%).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The involvement of Johannesburg critical nurses in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EOL</jats:styled-content> care discussions and decisions is infrequent despite their participation in care delivery and definite views about the process.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Relevance to clinical practice</jats:title><jats:p>Use of formal guidelines and education is recommended to increase the nurses' involvement in and their confidence in participating in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EOL</jats:styled-content> decisions. Educators, managers, senior nurses and other members of the multi‐disciplinary team should collaborate to enable critical care nurses to become more involved in <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">EOL</jats:styled-content> care.</jats:p></jats:sec>

dc.format.extent9-17
dc.format.mediumPrint-Electronic
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectEnd-of-life
dc.subjectIntensive care
dc.subjectSouth Africa
dc.titleSouth African critical care nurses' views on end‐of‐life decision‐making and practices
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeMulticenter Study
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000329505000003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue1
plymouth.volume19
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalNursing in Critical Care
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nicc.12026
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health/School of Nursing and Midwifery
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA03 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research (PIHR)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-04-04
dc.identifier.eissn1478-5153
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/nicc.12026
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2014-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV