Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGabriel, NRen
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-19T22:46:59Z
dc.date.available2017-12-19T22:46:59Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-20en
dc.identifier.issn0172-6404en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/10446
dc.description.abstract

Abstract: This paper develops a historical social psychology that can be used to understand young children’s social development. It compares the theoretical frameworks of three of the most important relational thinkers in the 20th century – Norbert Elias, Pierre Bourdieu, and Erich Fromm – to shed light on their attempts to integrate the insights of psychoanalysis into their sociological perspectives. I begin by exploring Bourdieu’s “uneasy” relationship with psychoanalysis, arguing that this has led to a less than successful quest by his followers for bridging concepts that can further develop the concept of social habitus. Fromm, one of the foremost but relatively neglected psychoanalysts of his generation, developed a relational psychoanalysis to explain the social relatedness of individuals in society. However, although his key concept of social character is a bold attempt to make sense of the historical forces that shape our individual and collective lives, it is still too heavily tied to the influence of economic structures in society. I argue that Elias is a more consistent, relational sociologist, able to develop highly nuanced concepts that can fully explain the social habitus of young children, focusing on his concept of “love and learning relationships” to explain how they grow up in society.

en
dc.format.extent207 - 226 (20)en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherGESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciencesen
dc.subjectElias, Bourdieu, habitus, social character, social psychology, relational sociology, childhood.en
dc.titleGrowing Up in Society - A Historical Social Psychology of Childhooden
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue4en
plymouth.volume42en
plymouth.publisher-urlhttp://0172-6404/en
plymouth.journalHistorical Social Researchen
dc.identifier.doi10.12759/hsr.42.2017.4.207-226en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Arts, Humanities and Business/Plymouth Institute of Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA23 Education
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Institute of Health and Community
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-11-21en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.12759/hsr.42.2017.4.207-226en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-12-20en
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV