Show simple item record

dc.contributor.supervisorCox, Geoffrey
dc.contributor.authorCharlton, James
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Arts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-06T12:14:27Z
dc.date.available2017-12-06T12:14:27Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier10478970en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/10377
dc.descriptionFull version: Access restricted permanently due to 3rd party copyright restrictions. Restriction set on 06.12.2017 by SE, Doctoral College
dc.description.abstract

How might ‘the digital’ be conceived of in an ‘expanded field’ of art practice, where ontology is flattened such that it is not defined by a particular media? This text, together with an installation of art work at the Exhibition Research Lab, Liverpool John Moores University (13-24 March), constitutes the thesis submission as a whole, such that in the practice of ‘reading’ the thesis, each element remains differentiated from the other and makes no attempt to ‘represent’ the other. In negating representation, such practices present a ‘radical’ rethinking of the digital as a differentiated in-itself, one that is not defined solely by entrenched computational narratives derived from set theory.

Rather, following Nelson Goodman’s nominalistic rejection of class constructs, ‘the digital’ is thus understood in onto-epistemic terms as being syntactically and semantically differentiated (Languages of Art 161). In the context of New Zealand Post-object Art practices of the late 1960s, as read through Jack Burnham’s systems thinking, such a digitally differentiated ontology is conceived of in terms of the how of practice, rather than what of objects (“Systems Aesthetics”). After Heidegger, such a practice is seen as an event of becoming realised by the method of formal indication, such that what is concealed is brought forth as a thing-in-itself (The Event; Phenomenological Interpretations 26).

As articulated through the researcher’s own sculptural practice – itself indebted to Post-object Art – indication is developed as an intersubjective method applicable to both artists and audience. However, the constraints imposed on the thing-in-itself by the Husserlian phenomenological tradition are also taken as imposing correlational limitations on the ‘digital’, such that it is inherently an in-itself for-us and thus not differentiated in-itself. To resolve such Kantian dialectics, the thesis draws on metaphysical arguments put forward by contemporary speculative ontologies – in particular the work of Quentin Meillassoux and Tristan Garcia (After Finitude; Form and Object). Where these contemporary continental philosophies provide a means of releasing events from the contingency of human ‘reason’, the thesis argues for a practice of ‘un-reason’ in which indication is recognized as being contingent on speculation. Practice, it is argued, was never reason’s alone to determine. Instead, through the ‘radical’ method of speculative indication, practice is asserted as the event through which the differentiated digital is revealed as a thing-in-itself of itself and not for us.

en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCreative New Zealanden_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAuckland University of Technologyen_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Plymouth
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectDigital Ontologyen_US
dc.subjectDigitalen_US
dc.subjectNew Materialismen_US
dc.subjectArt Practiceen_US
dc.subjectArt Researchen_US
dc.subjectSpeculative Realismen_US
dc.subjectrelationalen_US
dc.subjectPost-object Arten_US
dc.subjectformal indicationen_US
dc.subjectnon-correlationalen_US
dc.subjectNelson Godmanen_US
dc.subjectJack Burnhamen_US
dc.subjectspeculative indicationen_US
dc.subjectMartin Heideggeren_US
dc.subjectthing-in-itselfen_US
dc.subjectsystems-aestheticsen_US
dc.subjectthe eventen_US
dc.subjectpractice based researchen_US
dc.subjectonto-epistemologyen_US
dc.subjectsculptureen_US
dc.subjectinstallationen_US
dc.subjectontologyen_US
dc.subjectflat ontologyen_US
dc.subject.classificationPhDen_US
dc.titleCATCH | BOUNCE: Towards a relational ontology of the digital in art practiceen_US
dc.typeThesis
plymouth.versionnon-publishableen_US
dc.rights.embargodate9999-09-09
dc.rights.embargoperiodNo embargoen_US
dc.type.qualificationDoctorateen_US
rioxxterms.versionNA
plymouth.orcid_idorcid.org/0000-0003-2823-9876en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States

All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV