Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEdworthy, Judy
dc.contributor.authorHellier, Elizabeth
dc.contributor.authorTitchener, K
dc.contributor.authorNaweed, A
dc.contributor.authorRoels, R
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-15T10:44:20Z
dc.date.available2012-06-15T10:44:20Z
dc.date.issued2011-03
dc.identifier.issn0169-8141
dc.identifier.issn1872-8219
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/1034
dc.description.abstract

The primary objective of the experiments reported here was to demonstrate the effects of opening up the design envelope for auditory alarms on the ability of people to learn the meanings of a set of alarms. Two sets of alarms were tested, one already extant and one newly-designed set for the same set of functions, designed according to a rationale set out by the authors aimed at increasing the heterogeneity of the alarm set and incorporating some well-established principles of alarm design. For both sets of alarms, a similarity-rating experiment was followed by a learning experiment. The results showed that the newly-designed set was judged to be more internally dissimilar, and easier to learn, than the extant set. The design rationale outlined in the paper is useful for design purposes in a variety of practical domains and shows how alarm designers, even at a relatively late stage in the design process, can improve the efficacy of an alarm set. © 2011 Elsevier B.V.

dc.format.extent136-146
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.subjectAlarms
dc.subjectAuditory warnings
dc.subjectDesign
dc.subjectLearning
dc.titleHeterogeneity in auditory alarm sets makes them easier to learn
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000288293800006&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue2
plymouth.volume41
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ergon.2010.12.004
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Health
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA04 Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Research Groups/Centre for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour (CBCB)/Behaviour
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
dc.identifier.eissn1872-8219
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1016/j.ergon.2010.12.004
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV