Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, MIen
dc.contributor.authorHolding, JMen
dc.contributor.authorKappel, CVen
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, CMen
dc.contributor.authorBrander, Ken
dc.contributor.authorBrown, CJen
dc.contributor.authorBruno, JFen
dc.contributor.authorBuckley, Len
dc.contributor.authorBurrows, MTen
dc.contributor.authorHalpern, BSen
dc.contributor.authorKiessling, Wen
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Pen
dc.contributor.authorPandolfi, JMen
dc.contributor.authorParmesan, Cen
dc.contributor.authorPoloczanska, ESen
dc.contributor.authorSchoeman, DSen
dc.contributor.authorSydeman, WJen
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, AJen
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-29T18:53:24Z
dc.date.available2017-10-29T18:53:24Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01en
dc.identifier.issn1466-822Xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/10113
dc.description.abstract

© 2014 The Authors. Aim: To assess confidence in conclusions about climate-driven biological change through time, and identify approaches for strengthening confidence scientific conclusions about ecological impacts of climate change. Location: Global. Methods: We outlined a framework for strengthening confidence in inferences drawn from biological climate impact studies through the systematic integration of prior expectations, long-term data and quantitative statistical procedures. We then developed a numerical confidence index (Cindex) and used it to evaluate current practices in 208 studies of marine climate impacts comprising 1735 biological time series. Results: Confidence scores for inferred climate impacts varied widely from 1 to 16 (very low to high confidence). Approximately 35% of analyses were not associated with clearly stated prior expectations and 65% of analyses did not test putative non-climate drivers of biological change. Among the highest-scoring studies, 91% tested prior expectations, 86% formulated expectations for alternative drivers but only 63% statistically tested them. Higher confidence scores observed in studies that did not detect a change or tracked multiple species suggest publication bias favouring impact studies that are consistent with climate change. The number of time series showing climate impacts was a poor predictor of average confidence scores for a given group, reinforcing that vote-counting methodology is not appropriate for determining overall confidence in inferences. Main conclusions: Climate impacts research is expected to attribute biological change to climate change with measurable confidence. Studies with long-term, high-resolution data, appropriate statistics and tests of alternative drivers earn higher Cindex scores, suggesting these should be given greater weight in impact assessments. Together with our proposed framework, the results of our Cindex analysis indicate how the science of detecting and attributing biological impacts to climate change can be strengthened through the use of evidence-based prior expectations and thorough statistical analyses, even when data are limited, maximizing the impact of the diverse and growing climate change ecology literature.

en
dc.format.extent64 - 76en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleStrengthening confidence in climate change impact scienceen
dc.typeJournal Article
plymouth.issue1en
plymouth.volume24en
plymouth.publication-statusPublisheden
plymouth.journalGlobal Ecology and Biogeographyen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/geb.12218en
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering/School of Biological and Marine Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA07 Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Users by role/Academics
dc.identifier.eissn1466-8238en
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot knownen
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/geb.12218en
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
@mire NV