Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMainali, KP
dc.contributor.authorWarren, DL
dc.contributor.authorDhileepan, K
dc.contributor.authorMcConnachie, A
dc.contributor.authorStrathie, L
dc.contributor.authorHassan, G
dc.contributor.authorKarki, D
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, BB
dc.contributor.authorParmesan, Camille
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-29T18:51:33Z
dc.date.available2017-10-29T18:51:33Z
dc.date.issued2015-12
dc.identifier.issn1354-1013
dc.identifier.issn1365-2486
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/10111
dc.description.abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Modeling the distributions of species, especially of invasive species in non‐native ranges, involves multiple challenges. Here, we developed some novel approaches to species distribution modeling aimed at reducing the influences of such challenges and improving the realism of projections. We estimated species–environment relationships for <jats:italic>Parthenium hysterophorus</jats:italic> L. (Asteraceae) with four modeling methods run with multiple scenarios of (i) sources of occurrences and geographically isolated background ranges for absences, (ii) approaches to drawing background (absence) points, and (iii) alternate sets of predictor variables. We further tested various quantitative metrics of model evaluation against biological insight. Model projections were very sensitive to the choice of training dataset. Model accuracy was much improved using a global dataset for model training, rather than restricting data input to the species’ native range. <jats:styled-content style="fixed-case">AUC</jats:styled-content> score was a poor metric for model evaluation and, if used alone, was not a useful criterion for assessing model performance. Projections away from the sampled space (<jats:italic>i.e.,</jats:italic> into areas of potential future invasion) were very different depending on the modeling methods used, raising questions about the reliability of ensemble projections. Generalized linear models gave very unrealistic projections far away from the training region. Models that efficiently fit the dominant pattern, but exclude highly local patterns in the dataset and capture interactions as they appear in data (e.g., boosted regression trees), improved generalization of the models. Biological knowledge of the species and its distribution was important in refining choices about the best set of projections. A <jats:italic>post hoc</jats:italic> test conducted on a new Parthenium dataset from Nepal validated excellent predictive performance of our ‘best’ model. We showed that vast stretches of currently uninvaded geographic areas on multiple continents harbor highly suitable habitats for parthenium. However, discrepancies between model predictions and parthenium invasion in Australia indicate successful management for this globally significant weed.</jats:p>

dc.format.extent4464-4480
dc.format.mediumPrint
dc.languageen
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.subjectAUC
dc.subjectboosted regression trees
dc.subjectgeneralized additive models
dc.subjectgeneralized linear models
dc.subjectinvasive species
dc.subjectmodel evaluation
dc.subjectnonequilibrium distribution
dc.subjectParthenium hysterophorus
dc.subjectrandom forests
dc.subjectspecies distribution modeling
dc.titleProjecting future expansion of invasive species: comparing and improving methodologies for species distribution modeling
dc.typejournal-article
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
plymouth.author-urlhttps://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000364777400016&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=11bb513d99f797142bcfeffcc58ea008
plymouth.issue12
plymouth.volume21
plymouth.publication-statusPublished
plymouth.journalGlobal Change Biology
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/gcb.13038
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/Faculty of Science and Engineering
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA
plymouth.organisational-group/Plymouth/REF 2021 Researchers by UoA/UoA07 Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences
dc.publisher.placeEngland
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-06-10
dc.identifier.eissn1365-2486
dc.rights.embargoperiodNot known
rioxxterms.versionofrecord10.1111/gcb.13038
rioxxterms.licenseref.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2015-12
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Review


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


All items in PEARL are protected by copyright law.
Author manuscripts deposited to comply with open access mandates are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author.
Theme by 
Atmire NV